Pemakaian Bahasa Dalam Karya Ilmiah Populer
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
This article is intended to describe the characteristics of language used in popular scientific discourse, and its differences from ones usually found in pure scientific articles. A close and careful examination through some amount of data extracted from Intisari, one of the most popular scientific megazines in Indonesia, shows that the use of language in the popular megazine is considerably different from those generally exploited in more serious scientific articles. The differences include the use of long and short sentence combinations, reported speech, pronouns, simele and metaphor, diction, conjuction and other syntactic constituent ellipsis, and anecdotes and play on word. The popular style is important to master, especially by anyone who are involved and interested in popular writing activities. Accordingly, the standard variation is not the only style to teach in langage learning.
Downloads
References
Brewer, William & Edward H. Lichtenstein, 1982, “Stories are to Entertain: A Structural Affect Theory of Storiesâ€, Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473-468.
Coulthard, Malcolm. 1994, “On Analysing and Eavaluating Written Textâ€, in Advances in Written Text Abalysis, Malcolm Coulthard (Ed.), London: Routledge
Fries, Peter H. 1994, “On Theme, Rheme, and Discourse Goalsâ€, in Advances in Written Text Abalysis, Malcolm Coulthard (Ed.), London: Routledge.
Gunnarsson, Britt- Louise, 1997, “On The Sociohistorical Construction of Scientific Discourseâ€, in The Construction of Professional Discourse, (Edited by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linnell & Bengt Nordberg), New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985, Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in Social semiotic Prespective, Melbourne: Deakin university.
Holmes, Janet, 1992, An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, London: Longman
Hymes, Dell, 1974, Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Johns, Tim, 1994, “The Text and Its Messageâ€, in Advances in Written Text Abalysis, Malcolm Coulthard (Ed.), London: Routledge.
Joss, Martin, 1967, The Five Clocks, New York: Harcourt Brace World Inc.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti, 1975, “Beberapa Ciri Bahasa Indonesia Standarâ€, Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, I, 15-18.
Kushartanti, 2006, “Bahasa Indonesia Baku dan Tak Baku pada Percakapan Anak Jakartaâ€, Linguistik Indonesia, No. 1, Tahun ke-24, 1-10, Jakarta, Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia.
Leech, Geoffrey N., 1983, Principle of Pragmatics, New York: Longman.
McCarthy, Michael, 1994, “It, This and Thatâ€, in Advances in Written Text Abalysis, Malcolm Coulthard (Ed.), London: Routledge
Moeliono, Anton M., 1977, “Bahasa Indonesia dan Ragam-ragamnya, Sebuah Pengantarâ€, dalam Kompas, 25-26 Oktober 1977.
Pagano, Adriana, 1994, “Negatives in Written Textâ€, in Advances in Written Text Abalysis, Malcolm Coulthard (Ed.), London: Routledge.
Poerwadarminta, W.J.S., 1979, Bahasa Indonesia untuk Karang-Mengarang: Petunjuk Menggunakan Bahasa Indoenesia Secara Tepat-Praktis, Yogyakarta: UP Indonesia.
Ramlan, M., I Dewa Putu Wijana, Yohanes Tri Mastoyo, Sunarso, 1985, Inilah Bahasa Indonesia yang Salah dan yang Benar, Yogyakarta: Andi.
Soeseno, Slamet, 1995, Teknik Penulisan Ilimiah Populer: Kiat Menulis Nonfiksi untuk Majalah, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Triyoko, Hanung, 2005, Negasi dalam Wacana Tulis Ilmiah Berbahasa Indonesia, Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu, 1994, Kartun: Studi tentang Permainan Bahasa, Yogyakarta: Ombak.
__________________, 1996, Dasar-dasar Pragmatik, Yogyakarta: Andi.
SUMBER DATA
Intisari, September 2006, Jakarta: Gramedia.
Intisari, Oktober 2006, Jakarta: Gramedia.
Intisari, November 2006, Jakarta: Gramedia.
Intisari, Desember 2006, Jakarta: Gramedia.
Intisari, Februari, 2007, Jakarta: Gramedia
Yacob, T., 1998, Peran Ilmu-ilmu Lunak dalam Ilmu Pengobatan, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada.