RETRACTED: Semantic Structures of Vietnamese Perception Verbs: A Cognitive and Cultural Analysis

Main Article Content

Toan Ly Ngoc

Keywords

Vietnamese perception verbs, Conceptual metaphor, Cultural cognition, Embodied cognition

Abstract

This article has been retracted at the request of the author.


After publication, the author notified the editorial office of significant issues related to incorrect and inappropriate citation of sources as well as inaccurate reference entries that could potentially mislead readers and compromise the academic integrity of the work. The errors were not detected during the peer-review process and were brought to light post-publication.


The author takes full responsibility for the oversight and has requested the retraction in accordance with their commitment to ethical scholarly practice. The editorial board of Jurnal Arbitrer supports this decision and has retracted the article in line with the guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).


For details on our retraction policy, please visit:
https://arbitrer.fib.unand.ac.id/index.php/arbitrer/correction


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anh, T. T., (2023). Semantic features of Vietnamese perception verbs in literary works: A cognitive analysis. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 15(2), 45-62.
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. (2023). Embodied intersubjectivity in language and perception. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 8(1), 12-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-023-00125-x
Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2022). Cultural metaphors in East Asian languages: A comparative study. Asian Journal of Linguistics, 12(3), 178-195.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 565-598.
Davidson, R. (2020). Perception verbs in Southeast Asian languages. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 30(2), 156-178.
Evans, V. (2013). Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Geeraerts, D. (2015). Cognitive linguistics and the history of philosophical epistemology. In J. R. Taylor & J. Littlemore (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 15-35). Bloomsbury.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, C. (2014). Cognitive discourse analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 322-343.
Henderson, J. (2019). Metaphor and embodied cognition in Southeast Asian linguistics. Asian Studies Review, 43(2), 89-112.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315-339.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kemmerer, D. (2019). Concepts in the brain: The view from cross-linguistic diversity. Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lindner, S. (2016). Patterns of cognitive semantics in perception verbs. Cognitive Linguistics Studies, 3(2), 184-206.
Ly, N. T., & Nguyen, P. (2023). Conflation patterns of Vietnamese verbs: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Namibian Studies, 35, 2326-2352. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v35i.3975
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2011). The senses in language and culture. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 5-18.
Martinez, F., & Peterson, R. (2022). Embodied cognition in linguistic theory: New perspectives. Cognitive Science, 46(3), 89-112.
Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Cross-linguistic perspectives on perception verbs. Language Sciences, 84, 101-123.
Minh, H. T. (2023). Cognitive semantic features of Vietnamese visual perception verbs. International Journal of Language and Social Sciences, 3(2), 45-58.
Nakamura, T. (2018). Perception verbs and their cultural implications in Asian languages. Journal of East Asian Pragmatics, 3(1), 55-76.
Oakley, T., & Pascual, E. (2017). Conceptual blending theory. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 423-448). Cambridge University Press.
Raffaelli, A. (2019). Perception verbs between lexicon and grammar. Open Linguistics, 5(1), 532-559.
Rodriguez, M., & Kim, S. (2024). Modern approaches to cognitive linguistics in Asian contexts. Asian Linguistics Quarterly, 9(1), 15-32.
Romano, M., & Porto, M. D. (2020). Conceptual metaphor theory in cultural context. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(1), 43-65.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., & Norcliffe, E. (2015). Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31-71.
Sinha, C., & Jensen de López, K. (2000). Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2), 17-41.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1). MIT Press.
Thompson, R., & Lee, M. (2021). Perception verbs in contemporary Asian languages. Journal of Asian Linguistics, 15(3), 234-256.
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford University Press.
Viberg, A. (2020). Language-specific meaning patterns in perception verbs. Lexicographica, 36, 105-128.
Walsh, R. (2024). Cognitive linguistics and cultural metaphor theory: New directions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(1), 45-62.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2020). Meaning and relevance in linguistic theory. Language Sciences, 82, 125-142.
Yamamoto, K., & Chen, X. (2023). Cross-cultural perspectives on embodied cognition in East Asian languages. Asian Journal of Cognitive Science, 5(2), 78-95.
Zhang, L., & Liu, R. (2021). Perception verbs in Sino-Tibetan languages: A comparative analysis. Linguistic Typology, 25(2), 289-312.