The Role of Maxims in The Process of Investigations: A Case Study in Situbondo Resort Police Office
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the role of maxim in the conversation between the investigators and suspects in giving information during the making of investigation reports in Situbondo police office. This is an interdisciplinary linguistic research that utilizes linguistic and pragmatic disciplines. The theory used to analyze the data in this study is the theory of speech acts initiated by Searle. This is a qualitative descriptive research, and it produces deep descriptions of the words, writings, and behaviors that can be observed from a specific individual, group, society, or organization in a particular context that is holistically studied. The result of this research is the role of maxim in the process of investigation and the degree of the trustworthiness.
Downloads
References
Coulthard, M. (2005). Some Forensic Applications of Descriptive Linguistics. VEREDAS
Coulthard, M. & A. Johnson. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics London: Routledge.
Hadari, N. (1995). Buku Metode penelitian bidang sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Handayani.(2014). Tipe Pertanyaan, Respon dan Praanggapan yang Muncul pada Interviu Investigatif Kepolisian. Jurnal Parole Vol.4 (1), 38-53.
H.B. Sutopo(2006).Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : Dasar teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian Surakarta: Universitas. Sebelas Maret.
Houses of Parliament.(2015). Forensic Language Analysis. London: The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.
James, C. (1980). Contrastive Analysis. London
Kaelan.(2004). “Filsafat Analitis menurut Ludwig Wittgenstein: Relevansinya bagi Pengembangan Pragmatikâ€. dalam jurnal Humaniora volume 16, No. 2, Juni 2004: 133-146.
Kartono, K. (1999). Patologi Sosial. Jakarta: Raja grafindo Persada.
Kaswanti Purwo, B. (1990). Pragmatik dan Pengajaran Bahasa Menyibak Kurikulum 1984.Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. (terjemahan) M.D.D. Oka. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Mey, J. (1993). Pragmatics. Oxford: United Kingdom.
Santosa, R. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan. Draf Buku. Surakarta: Fakultas Sastra dan Seni Rupa
Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Tarigan, H.G. (2009). Pengajaran Sintaksis. Bandung:Angkasa.
________ . 2009.Prinsip-prinsip Dasar Sintaksis. Bandung:Angkasa.
Turell, M.T. (2008). The Role and Task of the Forensic Linguist in Giving Evidence.Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu.(1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
http://www.tribratanewssitubondo.com/berita-kapolres-situbondo-rilis-hasil-ungkap-33-kasus-kriminal-yang-resahkan-masyarakat.html##ixzz44GLuCCa3
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.