Flora Lexicon of Kaghati in Muna Speech Community
Main Article Content
Keywords
Flora, lexicon, kaghati, muna
Abstract
Diversity of the flora lexicon in the environment of Kaghati is part of the ethnic richness in the form of local knowledge that must be explored for the sake of environmental sustainability. This article intends to: (1) discover and portray the flora lexicon of kaghati; and (2) examine the dynamic of inter-generational comprehension. The researcher used qualitative method and upheld by quantitative method. The information required were gotten by perception, meeting, and poll strategies. At that point, the survey is directed upon 150 respondents. The extent of the respondents’ ages was from 15 to 65 years. In light of information examination, there were two discoveries discovered: (1) the flora lexicon of kaghati comprises of fifteen dictionaries as ostensible and biotic class. (2) There is an alternate degree of between generational comprehension on flora lexicon of kaghati. The old age (46-65 years) 84% (best), the middle generation (25-45 years) 74% (best), and the young generation (15-24 years) 55% (better).
Downloads
References
Bang, J. C., & Trampe, W. (2014). Aspects of an ecological theory of language. Language Sciences, 41, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.009
Bieck, W. (July 2002). (2002). “‘The First Kiteman’ -Proof by a prehistoric cave-painting in Indonesiaâ€.
Fernández-Vázquez, J. S. (2021). Analysing the environmental websites of the world’s greatest polluters: a multimodal ecolinguistic approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 34(1), 2692–2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1836993
Finke, P. (2014). The ecology of science and its consequences for the ecology of language. Language Sciences, 41, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.008
Khotimah, K., Laksono, K., Suhartono, S., Pairin, U., & Darni, D. (2021). Lingual expressions in the covid-19-related ecolexicons in Indonesian online-media coverage. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.19
Kravchenko, A. V. (2016). Two views on language ecology and ecolinguistics. Language Sciences, 54, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.12.002
Li, J., Steffensen, S. V., & Huang, G. (2020). Rethinking ecolinguistics from a distributed language perspective. Language Sciences, 80, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101277
Luardini, M. A., Asi, N., & Garner, M. (2019). Ecolinguistics of ethno-medicinal plants of the Dayak Ngaju community. Language Sciences, 74, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.003
Mbete, A. M. (2008). Ekolinguistik: Perspektif Kelinguistikan yang Prospektif. Bahan Matrikulasi Bagi Karyasiswa Program Magister Linguistikâ€. Denpasar: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana.
Mbete, A. M. (2011). Ilmu Bahasa, Lingkungan Bahasa dan Bahasa Lingkungan: Bahan Matrikulasi bagi Karyasiswa Program Magister Linguistik. Denpasar: Program Pascasarjana UNUD.
Mbete, A. M. (2002). Metode Linguistik Diakronis, Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.
Nash, J. (2016). Ecologically embedded languages, cumulative grammars and island ecologies1. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 48(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016.1243977
Norton, C., & Hulme, M. (2019). Telling one story, or many? An ecolinguistic analysis of climate change stories in UK national newspaper editorials. Geoforum, 104(February), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.01.017
Poole, R. (2018). Ecolinguistics, GIS, and Corpus Linguistics for the Analysis of the Rosemont Copper Mine Debate. Environmental Communication, 12(4), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275735
Poole, R., & Spangler, S. (2020). ‘Eco this and recycle that’: an ecolinguistic analysis of a popular digital simulation game. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617177
Puspoyo, E.W, Layang-Layang Di Indonesia: Kites of Indonesia. Jakarta: Museum Layang-Layang Indonesia, 2004.
Stibbe, A. (2014). an Ecolinguistic Approach To Critical Discourse Studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789
Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan (1st ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Urlica, A. A. D., & Stefanovic, S. (2018). Ecolinguistic qualities of the optimal English language learning experience. International Journal for Quality Research, 12(2), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR12.02-14
Uryu, M., Steffensen, S. V., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ecology of intercultural interaction: Timescales, temporal ranges and identity dynamics. Language Sciences, 41, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.006
Wenjuan, Z. (2017). Ecolinguistics: Towards a new harmony. Language Sciences, 62, 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.004
Zahoor, M., & Janjua, F. (2020). Green contents in English language textbooks in Pakistan: An ecolinguistic and ecopedagogical appraisal. British Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3579
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.