Page Header

  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Statistics
Home > Vol 4, No 1 (2017) > Widya

Editorial Board

Reviewer

Focus and Scope

Guidelines

Online Submission

Peer Review

Publication Ethic

Plagiarism and Retraction

Copyright

Publication Fee

Open Access

Indexing & Abstract

History

 

 

A Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts Used by English Lecturers in Languange Teaching at STKIP YDB Lubuk Alung

Siska Okta Widya

Abstract

The research was intended to describe types of speech acts performed by English lecturers in learning process at STKIP YDB Lubuk Alung. This research was descriptive qualitative. The data of this research were the English utterances performed by English lecturers. The researcher obtained the data by means of note-taking technique. First, the researcher recorded the English teaching in the class using a video camera. Next, the researcher made transcripts of the dialogues. Then, the transcribed dialogues were recorded into the data sheet. Finally the data were classified according to Searle’s classification of speech acts. In the data analysis the researcher applied interactive qualitative method and applied coding system. The research findings show that there were four types of speech acts performed by the English lecturers, namely representatives, directives, expressive and commissives, whereas declarations were not utilized by the English lecturer. The most frequently used illocutionary acts were directives (53%), while the least frequent illocutionary acts went to commissives (5%). The frequent use of directives indicates that the lecturer seemed to be aware of their status as a lecturer which was believed to be more powerful than her students. In such restricted context like classroom setting, it is common that the lecturer status is higher than her students since the relation between them is inherently asymmetrical. It was through directives the lecturers exerted her power over the students

 

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Curtis, O’Hagan, Care and Education in Early Childhood: A Student’s Guide to Theory and Practice. New York. Routledge Falmer, 2005.

Cutting, J. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge. 2002.

Hughes, Glyn, the Handbook of Classroom English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1984

Kreidler, Charles, Introducing English Semantics. London: Taylor and Francis e-Library. 2002

McCarthy, Michael. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991

Searle, John R. Expressing and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Sevillia. C. G, dkk.. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Jakarta; Universias Indonesia Press. 1993

Sudaryanto, Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press. 1993.

Yule, G. Pragmatics.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1996.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.4.1.10-16.2017 Copyright (c) 2017 Siska Okta Widya

Editorial

Welcome visitors, We are glad to announce you that Jurnal Arbitrer has just accreditated by Kemenristekdiki SINTA 2. We are now working on improving our management and quality so we can publish a high quality publication. We invite authors and reviewers from around the world to contribute in the discipline of linguistic.

ISSN

2550-1011 (Online)

2339-1162 (Print)

User
Notifications
  • View
  • Subscribe
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
real
time web analytics
 
 
 
 
Current Issue Atom logo
RSS2 logo
RSS1 logo

Published by:

Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (MLI) Universitas Andalas.



EuroPub


Lisensi Creative Commons

Under Liscense of Creative Commons Attributioni-NonCommercial 4.0 International.