The Impact of CBLT Approaches on Students' Learning Achievements for ESP Courses

Main Article Content

Muliati Muliati
Syarifuddin Dollah
Tamra Tamra
Ahmad Rossydi
St.Asriati AM

Keywords

CBLT approaches, learning achievement, ESP courses, motivation, communicative competence

Abstract

ESP courses in higher education are seen as one of the efforts to provide undergraduates with skills beneficial to their careers to meet the growing demand of young professionals. The study assessed the impact of CBLT approaches on the student’s learning achievement in ESP courses. The objective of the study was to find out the impact of CBLT on students’ learning achievement in ESP courses. This study employed a qualitative method design that applied a case study design. The data source in this study was thirty students from different study programs who implemented CBLT approaches in learning ESP courses at Bosowa University. The study applied a questionnaire utilizing the five-point Likert Scale to see their responses on the student’s learning achievement in ESP courses through CBLT approaches. The interview results applied the Nvivo R1-5 to know in depth their responses on learning ESP courses through CBLT approaches. Three types of data coding are used namely, open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Findings revealed that firstly, students believed that they could improve their English capability in learning ESP courses. Students were able to communicate in real life. Secondly, the findings revealed that students’ learning achievement on CBLT implementation can motivate students to learn ESP courses. Students believed that CBLT offers many opportunities for communication skills on ESP and use specific English in their disciplines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akomaning, E. (2019). Improving student internship through collaborative curriculum design: Needs and context analysis to inform the design process. In J. Pieters & et al (Eds.), Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning (pp. 105–114). Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_6
Arnó-Macià, E., & Mancho-Barés, G. (2015). The role of content and language in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at university: Challenges and implications for ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 37(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.007
Baghban, V., & Zohoorian, Z. (2011). A Review on the Effectiveness of using authentic materials in ESP courses. English for Specific Purposes World.
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. Newbury House.
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
Brinton, D., Sow, M., & Wesche, M. (1989). Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Brinton, Donna M. (2013). Content-Based Instruction in English for Specific Purposes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0191
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications Ltd.
Khoirunnisa, K., Suparno, S., & Supriyadi, S. (2018). Exposing ESP Teachers and Students’ Perception of Teaching Speaking for Tourism Program. Dinamika Ilmu. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v18i1.945
Krashen, S. (2013). Second Language Acquisition: Theory, Applications, and Some Conjectures. In Mexico City: Cambridge University.
Leaver, B. Lou, & Stryker, S. B. (1989). Content-Based Instruction for Foreign Language Classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 22(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02746.x
Lightbown, P. M. (2014). Focus on Content-Based Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Nhung, L. T. T., & Hoa, L. H. (2021). Needs analysis in ESP context: A case study of People’s Police University Students. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 11(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.11.1.1438.2021
Peng, Y. (2017). Content-Based Instruction of EFL and Its Effects on Learners ’ Needs in China. 6(3), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20170603.12
Tseng, C. H. (2015a). Implementation and perspectives of a content-based instruction course in an EFL context. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(8), 1–18.
Tseng, C. H. (2015b). International Journal of English Language Teaching. 3(8), 1–18.
Vattøy, K. D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2020)Teacher–student interactions and feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1707512
Veri Hardinansyah Dja’far, Bambang Yudi Cahyono, & Yazid Bashtomi. (2016). EFL Teachers’ Perception of University Students’ Motivation and ESP Learning Achievement. Journal of Education and Practice.
Wang, C., & Zhu, L. (2020). Effects of Content-Based Communicative Language Teaching in University English Writing Classes. 16(1), 32–38.
Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case Study Research: Theory. Methods. Practice. In Emerald Group Publishing Limited.