Copular Clauses in Malay with Distal Demonstrative Itu
Main Article Content
Keywords
Nonverbal predication, copula, copular clause, grammaticalisation, Malay
Abstract
The limited research in Malay nonverbal predication has predominantly revolved around the two attested copulas ialah and adalah. In fact, there is another grammatical element that appears to serve as a copula to the constituents flanking it, namely itu. Seeing that this distal demonstrative pronoun has never received any attention as a copula in the linguistics literature before, this study investigates the copular use of itu in Malay, focusing on its morphological, syntactic, semantic, and information-structural features within nonverbal clauses. Employing a qualitative approach through the descriptive method in linguistics, the analysis encompasses a range of nonverbal clauses taken from mainstream Malay news portals online to reveal that itu exhibits many copula-like characteristics. Constituent analysis was used to identify the linguistic features of the subject, the predicate, and most importantly itu. Only sentences with a generic subject and a predicate of the grammatical categories NP, AP, or PP were chosen so as to ensure that itu was not associated with the subject and the sentence was nonverbal. Morphologically, itu can combine with 3rd person ia to form a clarifying expression comparable to the embedded copular clause “which is…” in English. Syntactically, itu has the same distribution and behaviour as the other copulas in Malay. Semantically, itu is vacuous, making no contribution to the overall meaning of the clause. Information-structurally, itu does not carry any roles associated with the topic or focus. This research enriches our understanding of Malay linguistic structures, particularly in the underexplored area of nonverbal predication in Malay. Additionally, it provides historical linguists with insights into the evolution of pronominal elements into copulas as it happens. The findings have broader implications for the study of syntactic evolution and typological studies in Austronesian languages and beyond
Downloads
References
AFP. (2023, March 26). Angkara Ejek Hamilton, Piquet Didenda RM4.18 Juta. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/arena/permotoran/2023/03/949735/angkara-ejek-hamilton-piquet-didenda-rm418-juta
Alharbi, B. Y. (2017). The syntax of copular clauses in Arabic. Ph.D. Thesis. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Bahfein, S. (2021, November 7). Empat Langkah Bikin Kamar Mandi Ramah Anak. Kompas. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.com/properti/read/2021/11/07/163820421/empat-langkah-bikin-kamar-mandi-ramah-anak?page=all
Bhari, A. (2022, June 22). Kaedah Rukyah dan Hisab. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/addin/2022/06/854339/kaedah-rukyah-dan-hisab
Blood, D. L. (1977). A three-dimensional analysis of Cham sentences. In D. Thomas, E. Lee, and D. L. Nguyen (Eds.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics No.4, Chamic studies (pp. 53-76). Canberra: The Australian National University.
Bowdle, B. F., & Ward, G. (1995). Generic demonstratives. In J. Ahlers, L. Bilmes, J. S. Guenter, B. A. Kaiser, J. Namkung (Eds.), BLS 21: General session and parasession on historical issues in sociolinguistics/social issues in historical linguistics (pp. 32-43). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v21i1.1396
Che Noh, N. (2018, January 2). Macam-Macam Ragam. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/pendidikan/2018/01/369828/macam-macam-ragam
Choueiri, L. (2016). The Pronominal Copula in Arabic. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, 8(1), 101-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-00801005
Den Dikken, M. (2006). Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas (Vol. 47). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Eid, M. (1983). The Copula Function of Pronouns. Lingua, 59(2), 197-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90063-3
Enghels, R., Jansegers, M., & Bossuyt, T. (2024). Introduction to the Special Issue Grammaticalization across Languages, Levels, and Frameworks. Languages, 9(7), 254.
Fadzlyana, R. (2017, August 19). Kenal Pasti Punca Sembelit. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/sihat/2017/08/255481/kenal-pasti-punca-sembelit
Givón, T. (2015). Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In T. Givón (Ed.), The diachrony of grammar (pp. 163-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gundel, J. K. (1999). Topic, Focus, and the Grammar-Pragmatics Interface. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 6(1), 14.
Haspelmath, M. (in press). Nonverbal clause constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass. Retrieved from https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006673
Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Idris, R. (2018, May 24). Shahidan ‘Tak Mahu’ Azlan. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/politik/2018/05/429854/shahidan-tak-mahu-azlan
Ithnin, H. (2020, April 11). Cantik Itu Abstrak. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/WM/2020/04/565061/cantik-itu-abstrak
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., & Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1-124). University of Chicago Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1977). A mechanism for the development of copula morphemes. In C. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 419-444). New York, USA: University of Texas Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-012
Mat Hayin, N. A. (2024, May 30). Tenang Kais Remis. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/santai/2024/05/1095583/tenang-kais-remis
Mohd Ali, A. J. (2023, December 19). Anwar Dapat Perintah Injunksi Inter-Parte Terhadap Sanusi. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2023/12/1190860/anwar-dapat-perintah-injunksi-inter-parte-terhadap-sanusi
Mohd Tahir, M. R. (2022, October 27). Nak Tolong Biarlah Cara Betul. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/rencana/2022/10/896529/nak-tolong-biarlah-cara-betul
Mohd Yusoff, A. N. (2016, January 26). Abai Hak Syariah Punca Rumah Tangga Pincang. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/node/118089
Monks, T. & Davidson, K. (2021). Demonstrative shift and proximal markedness. Paper Presented at at Formal Diachronic Semantics 6, University of Cologne.
Mustaffa, A. R. (2018). Silent syntactic structures in Malay: Copular clauses. Journal of Modern Languages, 28, 20-43.
Mustaffa, A. R. (2022). Copular clauses in Malay: Synchronic, diachronic, and typological perspectives. PhD Thesis. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/2955
Omar, A. H. (2014). Nahu Melayu mutakhir (5th ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Peyraube, A., & Wiebusch, T. (1994). Problems relating to the history of different copulas in Ancient Chinese. In M. Y. Chen & O. J. L. Tseng (Eds.), In Honor of William SY. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change (pp. 383-404). Taipei: Pyramid Press.
Proudfoot, I. (1991). Concordances and Classical Malay. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land-en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 147(1), 74-95.
Pustet, R. (2003). Copulas: Universals in the categorization of the lexicon. OUP: Oxford.
Reuters. (2018, 24 Novemeber). Bieber Sambut ‘Hari Kesyukuran’ Pertama Sebagai Suami. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/global/2018/11/397882/bieber-sambut-hari-kesyukuran-pertama-sebagai-suami#google_vignette
Shuhari, M. H. (2023, September 11). Arahan ‘Umirtu’ Khusus untuk Nabi SAW. Harian Metro. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/addin/2023/09/1008487/arahan-umirtu-khusus-untuk-nabi-saw
Smith, A. D. M. (2017). Grammaticalization theory. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1-8). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Smith, G. (2008). Tok Pisin: morphology and syntax. In K. Burridge and B. Kortmann (Eds.), 3 The Pacific and Australasia (pp. 488-513). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Soriente, A. (2018). Deixis in Borneo: Kenyah and Punan. ETHNORÊMA, 14, 1-34. DOI: 10.23814/ethn.14.18.sor
Stassen, L. (1997). Intransitive predication. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Tadmor, U. (2007). Grammatical borrowing in Indonesian. In M. Yaron & S. Jeanette (Eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 301-328). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Tengku Azhar, T. N. (2023, October 14). Berbaloikah mahu jadi cantik, berkulit gebu hingga kehilangan nyawa. Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.bharian.com.my/wanita/rias/2023/10/1164923/berbaloikah-mahu-jadi-cantik-berkulit-gebu-hingga-kehilangan-nyawa
Vallejos-Yopán, R. (2023). From Demonstrative to Filler: Este in Amazonian Spanish and Beyond. Linguistics, 61(3), 651-678. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2021-0137
Van Gelderen, E. (2011). The pronominal copula cycle. In E. Van Gelderen (Ed.), The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Gelderen, E. (2015). The Copula Cycle. Lingue e Linguaggio, 14(2), 287-301.
Visser, E. (2022). A grammar of Kalamang. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Whitman, J. (2001). Relabelling. In S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas, & A. Warner (Eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms (pp. 220–240). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Woollams, G. D. (2005). Karo Batak. In A. Adelaar & N. P. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 534-561). Routledge.
Yap, F. H. (2007). Nominalizers (and Copulas) in Malay. Paper Presented at the International Workshop on Nominalizers and Copulas in East Asian and Neighboring Languages, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
