ChatGPT in The Lab: Analyzing the Potential Pros and Cons for Research Professionals

Main Article Content

Fouad Boulaid

Keywords

artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, OpenAI, learning platforms, innovative research methods

Abstract

ChatGPT is a natural large language model developed by OpenAI, which generates human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts. For researchers, ChatGPT can provide quick and accurate answers to academic questions. The study delves into the nuanced landscape and scrutinizes the benefits and pitfalls associated with the usage of ChatGPT among higher education researchers. Based on a convenient sampling, the study involves a mixed-methods approach that includes both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. One thousand ninety-nine researchers, who have used ChatGPT for various academic projects, are the subjects under study. The data was collected via online questionnaires and face-to-face interviews from four Moroccan universities and higher education institutions: Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Moulay Ismail University, and Al Akhawayn University. The research data is processed and analyzed through the SPSS software and analyzed to discern patterns and trends in ChatGPT usage. The findings of the study underscore the multifaceted impact of ChatGPT in academic research. The outcomes show that the benefits of ChatGPT include its ability to provide quick and accurate responses to queries, facilitate learning and information-seeking, and enhance communication skills. In contrast, the pitfalls include its potential to lead to an overreliance on technology, reduced critical thinking skills, and the risk of plagiarism. Such a result has significant implications for the integration of ChatGPT into academic research practices. While acknowledging its advantages, researchers are urged to approach its use with caution, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a balance between technological assistance and the preservation of essential cognitive skills. The study provides insights into the ongoing discourse on the role of Chatbots in higher education and underscores the need for researchers to incorporate strategies that harness the benefits of ChatGPT while mitigating its potential drawbacks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-Elaal, E., Gamage, S., & Mills, J. E. (2022). Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2046709
Akter, S., & Sarker, S. (2023). Exploring the Ethical Implications of OpenAI Chatbot: A Review of Literature. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(1), 1-18.
Ali, M. J., & Djalilian, A. (2023): Readership Awareness Series –Paper 4: Chatbots and ChatGPT - Ethical Considerations in Scientific Publications. Seminars in Ophthalmology, https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2193444
Alshater, M. (2022). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing academic performance: A case study of ChatGPT (December 26, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4312358 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312358.
Baeza-Yates, R. (2022). Ethical challenges in AI. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 15, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488560.3498370
Cox, A. (2022). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology., 74, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635
Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662
Elsen-Rooney, M. (2023). NYC education department blocks ChatGPT on school devices, networks. Retrieved on January 24 2023 from https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-chatgptwriting-artificial-intelligence.
Feldmann, A., & Lane, J. (2023). The Impact of OpenAI Chatbots on Education: A Review of the Literature. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 1-12.
Ghazali, K., & Murad, M. (2023). The Use of OpenAI Chatbots in Business: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43(1), 102172.
Goyal, I. (2023). AI Renaissance, artificial intelligence, information overload, human-computer interaction, decision-making. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(00), e012. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v4i00.12
Hassan, S., & Haider, B. (2023). The Role of OpenAI Chatbots in Healthcare: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), e35242.
Herft, A. (2023). A Teacher’s Prompt Guide to ChatGPT aligned with ‘What Works Best’ Guide. Retrieved on January 23 2023 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/15qAxnUzOwAPwHzoaKBJd8FAgiOZYcIxq/view.
Hu, L. (2023). Generative AI and Future. Retrieved on January 23 from https://pub.towardsai.net/generativeai-and-future-c3b1695876f2.
Jovanović, M. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Prospects. https://www.computer.org/csdl/magazine/co/2022/10/09903869/1H0G6xvtREk. 0.1109/MC.2022.3192720.
Kim, S. G. (2023). Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x
Li, Y., & Liang, W. (2023). The Application of OpenAI Chatbots in Customer Service: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 1-18.
Neema, N., & Dhawan, G. (2023). OpenAI Chatbots and the Law: A Review of the Literature. Computer Law & Security Review, 39(1), 105682.
OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. Published November 30, 2022. Accessed January 17, 2022. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/.
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Qureshi, S., & Bashir, S. (2023). OpenAI Chatbots in Social Media: A Review of the Literature. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 20563051221134835.
Rafiq, M., & Qazi, A. (2023). The Use of OpenAI Chatbots in Marketing: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(1), 1-12.
Shah, M., & Ahmad, A. (2023). The Impact of OpenAI Chatbots on the Workplace: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 33(1), 1-18.
Singh, A., & Kaur, P. (2023). The Role of OpenAI Chatbots in Research: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1), 1-12.
Terwiesch, C. (2023). Would Chat GPT3 get a Wharton MBA? A prediction based on its performance in the operations management course. Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton School: University of Pennsylvania.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes . Cambridge: Harvard University Press‎.
Warren, T. (2023, January 9). Microsoft is looking at OpenAI’s GPT for Word, Outlook, and PowerPoint. The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/9/23546144/microsoft-openai-word-powerpoint-outlookgpt-integration-rumor.
West, C.G. (2023). Ai and the FCI: Can chatGPT project an understanding of introductory physics? arXiv, pre-print. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.01067.
Zhai, X., (2022). ChatGPT User experience: Implications for education. (December 27, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4312418 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418.