On Emblematic Meanings of Traditional Medicinal Herbs: Local Wisdom Values in the Perspective of Culture-Specific Ecopragmatics
Main Article Content
Keywords
Emblematic menings, traditional medicinal herbs, local wisdom values, ecopragmatic perspective
Abstract
The research on emblematic meanings of traditional medicinal herbs is descriptive qualitative research. The data of the research were mostly obtained from texts containing descriptions of local wisdom values found in the names of traditional medicinal herbs. The data were also obtained from the researcher's intuitive ideas as a member of the community where the local wisdom is shared and lived by. The data were obtained by using two methods, namely observation, and speaking methods. The observation method was carried out by using a note-taking technique, while the speaking method was carried out by using the recording technique. The conversation between the researcher and the research informants was recorded and then transcribed to find the required data. The participatory interview method employed an in-depth interview to obtain the description of local wisdom values specifically. The proliferation of data was concluded by classifying and typifying the data after being identified from the sources. Data analysis was carried out using the distributional method with a direct element division technique to cover the linguistic dimensions of this ecopragmatic research. The data was also analyzed and interpreted by using the identity method to cover the pragmatic dimensions in this research. The research results show that: (1) the emblematic meanings are truly found in several traditional medicinal herbs in some parts of Indonesia; (2) the emblematic meanings of the traditional medicinal herbs are classified based on their shapes, uses, directions of the plant's flower, the smell of the plants, and the origins.
Downloads
References
Campisi, E., & özyürek, A. (2013). Iconicity as a communicative strategy: Recipient design in multimodal demonstrations for adults and children. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.007
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Diercie Dwyarie, R., & Tjahjani, J. (2019). Intercultural Concepts in Place Cliché by Jacques Godbout. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2019-2503-11
Do Couto, H. H. (2014). Ecological approaches in linguistics: A historical overview. Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.001
Ephratt, M. (2011). Linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic speech and silence. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.006
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed.
Gumperz, J. J. (2008). Interactional Sociolinguistics: A Personal Perspective. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch12
Jucker, A. H., & Taavitsainen, I. (2010). Historical pragmatics. Historical Pragmatics.
Lin, C.-H., & Lin, Y.-L. (2019). Grammatical and Lexical Patterning of Make in Asian Learner Writing: A Corpus-Based Study of ICNALE. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2019-2503-01
Mahsun, M. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Graï¬ndo Persada. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1991
Mey, J. L. (2006). Focus-on issue: Intercultural pragmatics and sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.002
Mey, J. L. (2017). The pragmatics of metaphor: An ecological view. In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391
Miller, E. R. (2009). Advanced language learning: the contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0377-3
Mungmachon, M. R. (2012). Knowledge and Local Wisdom : Community Treasure. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1785-2015
Nambiar, R. M. K., Hashim, R. S., & Yasin, R. M. (2018). Impact of integrating local culture into language materials on communicative ability of Malaysian lower secondary learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(4), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2404-02
Peace, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (2006). Environmental Discourses. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123203
Rahardi, R. Kunjana., Setyaningsih, Y. (2019). Contextualizing Local Values of Children’s Games in the Perspective of Ecopragmatics to Enhance Culture-Specific Based Communication. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(Issue-1, October 2019), 143–151. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.A1096.109119
Rahardi, K., & Setyaningsih, Y. (2019). Today’s Local Values of Traditional Children’s Games: A Methaphorical Ecolinguistics View. Linguistik Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v37i2.102
Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Pragmatic Perspective on Phatic Functions and Language Dignity. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C, May 2019), 261–268. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.E1039.0585C19
Salzmann, Z., Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1993). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/416910
Schlenker, P. (2018). Iconic pragmatics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9392-x
Senanayake, S. G. J. N. (2016). Indigenous knowledge as a key to sustainable development. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v2i1.8117
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Wimberley, E. T. (2017). Ecopragmatics. Ecopragmatics. https://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-61229-613-5/cgp
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Methods of critical discourse studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7361(09)70018-4
