KOMPETENSI MAKROSTRUKTUR MAHASISWA UNIDHA DILIHAT DARI FUNGSI HEMISFER KANAN
Abstract
Research on language competence of university students is critical since many people consider them have problem in well manner, especially in communication. Communication is not only passing information from speaker to hearer through language but also involve critical thinking and cognitive aspect of language. Macrostructure is competence which reflects speakers ability in using cognitive aspect to processing language. While microstructure is processed in left hemispher, macrostructure depends on process in right hemisphere. It is because macrostructure need holistic processing which connect partial informations and figure out the relation between the informations. Research toward students of Universitas Dharma Andalas shows that many students have problem in processing macrostructure aspect of language. About 81% participants have problem in summarizing, 75% participants have problem in memorizing adjective, 70% participants have problem in immidiate memory processing, 75% particiants have difficulty in figuring implicit relation, and 70% participants have difficult in using cohesion.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bierwisch, M. (1965). Poetic and Linguistik. Dalam H. Kruezer & R. Gunzenhanser (Eds.), Mathematikund dichtung. München: Nymphenburger.
Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1993a). Comprehension of Narrative Discourse by Aphasic Listeners. Dalam H. H. Brownwell & Y. Joanette (Eds.),
Narrative discourse in neurologically im-paired and normal aging adults (pp. 151-170). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Brown, Gillian dan Goerge Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Dharmaperwira-Prins, Reni. (2004). Gangguan-gangguan Komunikasi Hemisfer Kanan dan Pemeriksaan Komunikasi Hemisfer Kanan (PKHK). Jakarta: Djambatan.
Fonseca, Rochele Paz, dkk. (2009). Hemispheric Specialization for Communicative Processing: Neuroimaging Data on the Role of the Right Hemisphere. Psychology & Neuroscience, (Vol. 2, No. 1, hal. 25 – 33).
Handoko (2015). Language Competence of Student Toward Right Hemispher Brain Function : A Neuropragmatic Study. Arbitrer. Vol. 2, hal 1-10)
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review (85, hal. 363-394).
Kobayashi, Frank. (2010). Linguistic Effects on the Neural Basis of Theory of Mind. The Open Neuroimaging Journal. (Vol. 4, hal. 37-45).
Lenneberg, Eric H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley. Myers, P. (1993). Narrative expressive deficits associated with right-hemisphere damage. Dalam H. H.Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.), Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults (hal. 279-296). San Diego, CA:
Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Ryder, Nuala, dkk. (2008). A Cognitive Approach to Assessing Pragmatic Language Comprehension in Children with Specific Language Impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder. (Vol. 43, hal. 427-447).
Ulatowska, Hanna K, dkk. (1999). Macrostructure and Inferential Processing in Discourse of Aphasic Patients. Psychology of Language and Communication(Vol. 3 No 2, hal. 3-20).
Sastra, Gusdi, dkk. (2012). Penerapan Model Terapi Linguistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bicara Penderita Disartria. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Internasional Budaya Membentuk Jati Diri dan Karakter Bangsa, Universitas Andalas, Padang, 13-14 November.
Sastra, Gusdi. (2011). Neurolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta
Wacana Univ. Press.
Wolfe, Victoria. (2010). Brain Metters: Translating Research into Classroom Practice. USA: Alexandria.