Embracing Pluriversalism in Knowledge Production and Dissemination Towards the Ethical Imperative to Listen to "Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise"
Main Article Content
Keywords
scholarly publication, Euro-and Western-centric orientation, pluriversalim of knowledge, non-Euro-and Western-modes of thinking, worlds and knowledges otherwise
Abstract
The fetish for disseminating knowledge through scholarly publication is tangible today with local scholars being heavily pressured to publish in both indexed local and international journals. While this intellectual endeavour is commendable for knowledge generation and dissemination, the very notion of knowledge is still strongly influenced by the Euro-and Western-centric orientation. This article problematizes the perpetuation of such knowledge especially in local academic publishing (i.e. Indonesia), and invites local scholars to mull over the possibility for thinking and acting otherwise, for seeking a radical alternative out of the existing alternatives, and for considering other ways of knowing and of being – that is to say, to embrace pluriversalim of knowledge through a space of “worlds and knowledges otherwise” (Escobar, 2007). In so doing, we can cultivate among local scholars another way of thinking – non-Euro-and non-Western-modes of thinking. The article will first examine the long-held scientific tradition in local academic writing and publishing practices. Then it discusses the lingering processes of intellectual hegemony in these practices. Finally, it offers another radical thought for creating a space of worlds and knowledges otherwise.
Downloads
References
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
Curry, M.J. & Lillis, T. (eds.). (2018). Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives and pedagogies Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. New York: Routledge.
de Sousa Santos, B. de (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the south. Durham: Duke University Press.
Deumert, A. & Makoni, S. (2023). Introduction: From southern theory to decolonizing sociolinguistics. In A. Deumert & A. Pennycook (eds.), From Southern Theory to Decolonizing Sociolinguistics (pp. 1-17). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Engelson, A. (2014). The “Hands of God” at work: Negotiating between Western and religious sponsorship in Indonesia. College English, 76(4), 292-312.
Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and knowledges otherwise. Cultural Studies, 21 (2-3), 179-210). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506
Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking-feeling with the earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the South. Revisita de Antropologia Iberoamericana, 11, 11-32.
Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible (translated by David Frye). Durham: Duke University Press.
Figueiredo, E.H. & Martinez, J. (2021). The Locus of Enunciation as a Way to Confront m Epistemological Racism and Decolonize Scholarly Knowledge, Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 355-359. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz061
García, O., Flores, N., Seltzer, K., Wei, L., Otheguy, R., & Rosa, J. (2021). Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(3), 203-228. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15427587.2021.1935957
Grosfoguel, R. (2020). Epistemic extractivism. A dialog with Alberto Acosta, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. In B. de Sousa Santos & M.P. Meneses (eds.), Knowledges born in the struggle: Constructing the epistemologies of the global south (pp. 203-218). New York: Routledge.
Kubota, R. (2020). Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics, Applied Linguistics 41(5), 712-732. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033
Kubota, R. (2022). Linking Research to transforming the real world: critical language studies for the next 20 years, Critical Inquiries in Language Studies (online version). https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2159826
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2016). The decolonial option in English Teaching: Can the Subaltern act?, TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 66-85. doi: 10.1002/tesq.202
Lee, J. & Jenks, C. (2018). Aestheticizing language: Metapragmatic distance and unequal Englishes in Hong Kong. Asian Englishes 21(2), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1448962.
Mignolo, W.D. & Walsh, C.E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, and praxis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nygaard, L.P. & Bellanova, R. 2018. “Lost in Quantification: Scholars and the Politics of Bibliometrics.” In In M.J. Curry & T. Lillis (Eds.,) Global Academic Publishing: Policies, Perspectives and Pedagogies (pp. 23-36). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Min, H-T. (2014). Participating in international academic publishing: A Taiwan perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 48(1), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.154
Oostendorp, M. (2023). ‘Sociolinguistics maak my Skaam (Sociolinguistics makes me ashamed): Humour as decolonial methodology. In In A. Deumert & A. Pennycook (eds.), From Southern Theory to Decolonizing Sociolinguistics (pp. 219-238). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Pennycook, A. (2023). From Douglas Firs to giant cuttlefish: Reimagining language learning. In A. Deumert & A. Pennycook (eds.), From Southern Theory to Decolonizing Sociolinguistics (pp. 71-89). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Phyak, P. (2021). Epistemicide, deficit language ideology, and (de)coloniality in language education policy, International Journal of Sociology of Language, 267-268, 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0104
Politzer-Ahles, Holliday, S., Girolamo, J.J., Spychalska, T. & Berkson, K.H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016), Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.09.003
Rajagopalan, K. (2005) The language issue in Brazil: When local knowledge clashes with expert knowledge. In S. Canagarajah (ed.), Reclaiming the local in policy and practice (pp. 99-121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ramose, M. (2020). On finding the cinerarium for uncremated ubuntu: On the streer wisdom of philosophy. In B. de Sousa Santos & M.P. Meneses (eds.), Knowledges born in the struggle: Constructing the epistemologies of the global south (pp. 58-77). New York: Routledge.
Shorten, A. (2017). Four Conceptions of Linguistic Disadvantages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 38 (7), 607-621. https: //doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1192174
Sugiharto. S. (2022). Enacting the Locus of Enunciation as a Resistant Tactic to Confront Epistemological Racism and Decolonize Scholarly Knowledge, Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa023
Sugiharto, S. (2023). Untangling the politics of (re) production of nonexistence in academic writing and publishing. Critical Inquiry in Language Study, 21(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2023.2187393
Sugiharto, S. (2021). Dewesternizing hegemonic knowledge in global academic publishing: Toward a politics of locality, Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 16(4), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2021.2017442
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
