Peculiarities of Metathesis in Kunha Language
Main Article Content
Keywords
Kisan, Kunha, metathesis, language change, variation, contact, phonological adaptation
Abstract
This paper focuses on metathesis, a linguistic phenomenon observed in the unique language called Kunha, a part of the North-Dravidian language family, where sounds are swapped within words. So, instead of the anticipated order of ..xy.. in a sequence of participating sounds, we encounter ..yx.. The final segments of a word can vary depending on the context; in some cases, they appear as a vowel followed by a consonant, while in others, they may be a consonant followed by a vowel. Metathesis in the Kunha language (Odisha, India), analysing its phonological patterns and linguistic implications from a synchronic perspective. Data was collected via 5,000 lexicons and sociolinguistic interviews with NORMs in Sundergarh and Sambalpur districts of Odisha state, alongside comparisons to Kurux and Dravidian etymological sources. Theoretical frameworks categorise metathesis as (1) copy-delete/coalescence operations, (2) transposition outcomes, or (3) allomorphy-driven CV/CC/CVC rearrangements. The results focus on Kunha’s pervasive yet irregular CV/CC/CVC metathesis, previously undocumented, highlighting its typological rarity and challenges for linguistic prediction. For example, the word /oɽok/ ‘bark of a tree’ in Kurux, changes to /uɽku:/ in Kunha. Similarly, /calkur/ ‘sand, gravel’ in Kurux, transforms to /calkri:/ in Kunha. These peculiarities in sound change are not limited to CV (consonant-vowel) clusters; they also occur in CC (consonant-consonant) clusters. For instance, /maːkcuːɳɖ/ ‘name of a flower’ in Kurux, changes to /maːskuːɽ/ in Kunha, resulting in the sound change from [kc] to [sk]. Additionally, metathesis can affect CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) order, as seen in the transformation of /letheɽ okk-aː/ ‘to sit with the legs crossed’ in Kurux, into /thepeɽ okk-aː/ in Kunha, yielding the change from [leth] to [thep]. Due to these sound transpositions, there is an emergence of a new speech variety called Kunha.
Downloads
References
Bauer, L & Warren, P. (2004). New Zealand English: Phonology. In Bernd Kortmann & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, vol. 1: Phonology, 580–602. De Gruyter.
Besnier, N. (1987). An autosegmental approach to metathesis in Rotuman. Lingua 73. 201–223. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(87)90008-8
Blevins, J. & Garrett, A. (1998). The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis. Language, 74(3), 508–556. doi: 10.1353/lan.1998.0012
Blevins, J. & Garrett, A. (2004). The evolution of metathesis. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 117–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.005
Buckley, E. (2011). Metathesis. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, & Keren Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Vol. 3, Phonological processes. Blackwell Companions to Linguistics Series. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0059
Burrow, T. & Emeneau, M. B. (1984). A Dravidian etymological dictionary. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Available online: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/burrow/]
Canfield, T. A. (2016). Metathesis is real, and it is a regular relation. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University. [Available online: https://repository.digital.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1040758]
Chandlee, J. & Heinz, J. (2012). Bounded copying is subsequential: Implications for metathesis and reduplication. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology, 42-51, Montréal, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. [Available online: https://aclanthology.org/W12-2306.pdf]
Chandlee, J. (2023). Metathesis. In Peter Ackema, et al (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to Morphology. Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119693604.morphcom041
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F. & Fennig, C. D. (eds.). (2023). Ethnologue: Languages of Asia, 26th Edition). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [https://www.ethnologue.com/ethnoblog/welcome-26th-edition/].
Edwards, O. D. E. (2018). The morphology and phonology of metathesis in Amarasi. Morphology 28(1): 25–69. doi: 10.1007/s11525-017-9314-y
Edwards, O. D. E. (2020). Metathesis and unmetathesis in Amarasi. Berlin: Language Science Press. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3700413
Emeneau, M. B. (1962). Brahui and Dravidian comparative grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gilbert, M. & Mooney, K. (2022). Metathesis is late and fake. In Peter Jurgec, Liisa Duncan, Emily Elfner, Yoonjung Kang, Alexei Kochetov, Brittney K. O’Neill, Avery Ozburn, Keren Rice, Nathan Sanders, Jessamyn Schertz, Nate Shaftoe, and Lisa Sullivan (eds.), Supplemental Proceedings of the 2021 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America. doi: 10.3765/amp.v9i0.5157]
Goswami, G. S. (1989). Kisan. Bhubaneswar: Academy of Tribal Dialects & Culture.
Hume, E. (1991). Metathesis in Maltese: Implication for the Strong Morphemic Plane Hypothesis. NELS 21. 157–171. [Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14394/36640]
Hume, E. (1998). Metathesis in phonological theory: the case of Leti. Lingua 104. 147–186. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3841(97)00031-4
Hume, E. (2001). Metathesis: Formal and functional considerations. In E. Hume, N. Smith & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Surface Syllable Structuring and Segment Sequencing. Leiden, NL: HIL. doi: 10.7282/T37S7QH8
Hume, E. (2004). The indeterminacy/attestation model of metathesis. Language 80(2), 203-237. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0083
Hume, E., & Seyfarth, S. (2019). Metathesis. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0242
Horwood, G. V. (2004). Order without chaos: relational faithfulness and position of exponence in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
Konow, S. (1906). Munda and Dravidian Languages. In G. A. Grierson (ed.), Linguistic survey of India, vol. IV. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing [Repr. 1967. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass].
Kujur, A.K. (2016). Tense and aspect system in Kisan. Indian Linguistics, 77(1-2), 133-144.
Kujur, A. K. (2021). Echo formations and expressives in the Kunha Language. Osmania Papers in Linguistics (OPiL), 46 & 47, 141-154. [Available online: https://arts.osmania.ac.in/Journals/Linguistics/Volume%2046-47.pdf]
Kujur, A.K. (2024). Formation of a new dialect in contact situation: An evidence from Kunha in Odisha. ADIVASI Journal of Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute (SCSTRTI), 64(1), 14-25.
Kiegel-Keicher, Y. (2020). Simple metathesis in loanword phonology: the Arabic-Romance language contact. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 136(4), 1049-1084. doi: 10.1515/zrp-2020-0057
Kobayashi, M., & Tirkey, B. (2017). The Kurux Language grammar, Texts and Lexicon. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Krishnamurti, Bh. (1961). Telugu verbal bases: A comparative and descriptive study. UCPL 24. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Krishnamurti, Bh. (1978). Areal and lexical diffusion of sound change: Evidence from Dravidian. Language 54, 1-20. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198241225.003.0010
Krishnamurti, Bh. (2003). The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486876
Macuch, R. (1965 [2014]). Handbook of classical modern Mandaic. [Repr. 2024]. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
McCarthy, J. J. (2000). The prosody of phrase in Rotuman. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18(1), 147-197. doi: 10.1023/A:1006342918830
Mielke, J. & Hume, E. (2000). Consequences of word recognition for metathesis. In Elizabeth Hume, Norval Smith, & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Surface syllable structure and segment sequencing, 135–158. Leiden, The Netherlands: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
Montreuil, J. P. (1985). The Romansch ‘Brat’. Papers in Romance 3, 67–76.
Mooney, K. (2022). Phonology cannot transpose evidence from Meto. Phonology, 39(2), 293–343. doi: 10.1017/S0952675723000088
Perumalsamy, P. (2002). Kisan. In J. K. Banthi (ed.), Orissa, Linguistic survey of India, 497-512. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.
Perumalsamy, P. (2004). Kisan mother tongue, its reflection in the recent censuses and its basic linguistic features. Working papers on linguistics and literature, IV.
Powell, J. V. (1985). An occurrence of metathesis in Chimakuan. Oceanic linguistics special publications 20. 105–110.
Rao, D. G. et al. (2016). Language documentation handbook. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
Roy, S.C. (1915). The Oraons of Chota Nagpur: Their history, economic life, and social organisation. Ranchi Bar Library.
Steever, S. B. (ed.). (2019). The Dravidian Languages. London and New York: Routledge.
Stonham, J. (2006). Metathesis. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 8, 92-94. Oxford: Elsevier.
Subrahmanyam, P. S. (1971). Dravidian Verb Morphology. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.
Takahashi, C. (2018). No metathesis in Harmonic Serialism. In Gillian Gallagher, Maria Gouskova & Sora Heng Yin (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington: Linguistic Society of America. 12. DOI: 10.3765/amp.v5i0.4232
Takahashi, C. (2019). No transposition in Harmonic Serialism. Phonology, 36(4), 695–726. doi: 10.1017/S0952675719000344
Ultan, R. (1978). A typological view of metathesis. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles Albert Ferguson, & Edith A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language. Vol. 2, Phonology, 367-402. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Webb, Charlotte A. Y. (1974). Metathesis. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Biswanandan Dash, Berhampur University
Dr Biswanandan Dash is presently associated to the Berhampur University, Berhampur, Odisha as an Associate Professor of Linguistics. Before this, he has had teaching experience about 24 years at Centurion University, Utkal University of Culture, Bhubaneswar and Biju Patnaik University of Technology, Odisha. He has earned his M.A, M. Phil and Ph. D. in Linguistics from the institutes of repute. His research interests lie on the various aspects of Language Documentation; Applied Linguistics; Translation Studies, issues relating to Language Loyalty & Identity, and Odia as a Classical Language.