Deviation or Glocalization? Rhetorical Differences in Research Article Introductions Written by International, English FL, and Indonesian L1 Authors

Main Article Content

M. Affandi Arianto https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-8640

Maulluddul Haq https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4167-5744

Jufrizal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2186-1873

Dwi Bayu Saputra https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-7795

Dewi Syafrina https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4578-3989

Keywords

cross-cultural investigation, contrastive rhetoric, genre-based investigation, glocalization, research article introduction

Abstract

Following English rhetorical conventions in English academic texts, especially by non-native English authors, does not necessarily mean disregarding some rhetorical practices of their national language. Although investigating English RAs has largely been focused on how the textual structure of the section is written in English by native English speakers and non-native English speakers, there has a limited empirical attention so far related to the investigation of rhetorical differences between RA introductions written in English and those written in Indonesian. After a thorough genre-based investigation of 60 RAs published from 2019 to 2023 using the modified CARS model (Swales, 1990, 2004), this study has revealed that the use of each rhetorical style, including moves, steps, and patterns, in English and Indonesian RA introductions is different. The result indicates that although the moves and steps display a close affinity with the CARS model, we found higher use of Move 1, i.e., establishing a territory, in the language teaching RA introductions written in Indonesian than in English. On top of that, while international authors (IAs) established their niches adequately, Indonesian authors (Eng-FL) established their niches inadequately, seemingly due to the influence of their national language (Indonesian). Moreover, the Indonesian language not only affects the frequency of occurrence of the moves and steps but also contributes to the pattern deviations found in the English RA introductions written by the Indonesian authors. This study provides pedagogical implications for academic writing and insights for Indonesian authors to write English articles using English rhetorical styles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdolmalaki, S. G., Tan, H., Abdullah, A. N., Sharmini, S., & Geok Imm, L. (2019). Introduction chapter of traditional and article-based theses: A comparison of rhetorical structures and linguistic realisations. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-07
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Hladchenko, M. (2023). Assessing the effects of publication requirements for professorship on research performance and publishing behaviour of Ukrainian academics. Scientometrics, 128, 4589-4609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04753-y
Adnan, Z. (2009). Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language Journals. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 107–125. Retrieved from https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/somepotential-problems-for-research-articles-written-by-indonesian-academics-when-submitted-tointernational-english-language-journals/
Adnan, Z. (2014). Prospects of Indonesian Research Articles (RAs) being considered for publication in ‘center’ journals: A comparative study of rhetorical patterns of RAs in selected humanities and hard science disciplines. In Lyda, A., & Warchal, K (Eds), Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research (pp. 79–99). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02526-1_6
Afshar, H. S., Doosti, M., & Movassagh, H. (2018). A genre analysis of the introduction section of applied linguistics and chemistry research articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 21(1), 163–214. Retrieved from https://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2856-en.html
Amnuai, W. (2021). A Comparison of niche establishments in English research article introductions published in international and Thai journals. Discourse and Interaction, 14(2), 24-40 https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2021-2-24
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2013). An analysis of moves in introductions in international and Thai journal research articles. PASAA: A Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 45, 1-30.
Ankomah, C., & Afful, J. B. A. (2019). Establishing a niche in research: Rhetorical strategies in undergraduate and postgraduate writings in the department of English, University of Cape Coast. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 7(3), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1903359А
Arianto, M. A., Haq, M., & Jufrizal. (2023). Research article introductions in applied linguistics: A comparative study on the use of appeals. Journal of Language and Education, 9(2), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.16163
Arianto, M. A. (2021). Authors’ strategies for indicating research gaps in ELT research article introductions in reputable journals. [Dissertation]. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Arianto, M. A., & Basthomi, Y. (2021). The authors‟ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1743-1759. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.127
Arianto, M. A., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Wulyani, A. N. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations…: Indonesian Doctoral Students‟, Indonesian Academics‟, and International Authors‟ Research Gap Strategies in ELT Research Article Abstracts and Introductions. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 2544. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735
Arono., & Arsyad, S. (2019). The effect of genre-based mentoring on rhetorical quality of research article drafts by Indonesian lecturers in social sciences and humanities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1233a
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Adnan, Z. (2020). The argument style in research article discussions to support research findings in language studies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16626
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., Sukamto, K. E., & Adnan, Z. (2019). Factors hindering Indonesian lecturers from publishing articles in reputable international journals. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 9(1), 42-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v9i1.982
Arsyad, S., & Adila, D. (2018). Using local style when writing in English: the citing behaviour of Indonesian authors in English research article introductions. Asian Englishes, 20(2), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2017.1327835
Arsyad, S., & Wardhana, D.E.C. (2014). Introduction in Indonesian social sciences and humanities research articles: How Indonesian Justify their research project. Linguistik Indonesia, 32(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v32i2.23
Basthomi, Y., Wulyani, A. N., & Rohmah, Z. (2021). At least, one more step, please: Implications of the gap. In Hardini, T. I., & Wirza, Y (Eds.). Learning Strategies and Learner Autonomy: Pedagogical Struggles and Opportunities through Digital Technologies in Language and Literature Education (A Festschrift for Prof. Nenden Sri Lengkanawati). pp. 268-276. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Press. in press.
Briones, R. R. Y. (2012). Move analysis of philosophy research article introductions published in the University of Santo Tomas. Philippines ESL Journal, 9, 56-75.
Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers‟ niche establishment in the Literature Review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006
Chinaprayoon, W. (2016). Move Analysis of Introduction Section in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Burapha University
Deveci, T. (2020). The introduction section of research articles in English and Turkish: The case of educational sciences – a preliminary study. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710233
Farnia, M., & Barati, S. (2017). Writing introduction sections of research articles in applied linguistics: Cross-linguistics study of native and non-native writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 486–494. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357
Frandsen, T. F., Lamptey, R. B., Borteye, E. M., & Teye, V. (2022). Achieving a professorship with proper academic merit: discouraging questionable publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 53(3), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2021-0021
Hashim, S., Ahmed, A., & Jomaa, N. (2024). Investigating stance and engagement markers in Ph.D. theses of Libyan EFL Postgraduates. Kufa Journal of Arts, 1(60), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.36317/kja/2024/v1.i60.15214
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Hyland, K. (2023). Academic publishing and the attention economy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101253
Hyland, K., & Jian, F. K. (2020). “This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100867
Irawan, D. E., Abraham, J., Ridlo, I. A., Nugraha, H. D., Wekke, I. S., Fuad, A., Rudyawan, A., & Seftyono, C. (2023). Comments on “Ranking researchers: Evidence from Indonesia” by Fry et al. (2023). Research Policy, 52, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104817
Irawati, L. (2022). Potential factors influencing the rhetorical patterns of research article discussion sections. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21267
Jasrial, D., Arsyad, S., & Arono. (2019). The effect of genre-based mentoring on linguistic feature quality of research article abstracts by Indonesian lecturers in social sciences and humanities. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 4(2), 146-161. https://dx.doi.org/10.33369/joall.v4i2.7780
Jasrial, D., Arsyad, S., Arono., & Yunita, W. (2021). Writing research article abstracts by using genre-based mentoring method: Viewed from rhetorical moves and tenses usage. Ethical Lingua, 8(2), 474-485. 10.30605/25409190.304
Justham, D. (2006). What is research? Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 10, 228-231.
Kafes, H. (2018). A Genre Analysis of English and Turkish Research Article Introductions. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(1), 66-79.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Khélifi, N., & Al-Amri, A. (2018). Springer workshop on how to get published in a scientific journal: Tips from springer editors. In A. Kallel et al. (eds.), Recent advances in environmental science from the Euro-Mediterranean and surrounding regions, Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (pp. 45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70548-4_17
Khani, R., & Tazik, K. (2010). A comparative study of introduction and discussion sections of sub-disciplines of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Applied Language Studies (JALS), 1 (2), 97-122.
Kwan, B. S. C., Chan, H., & Lam, C. (2012). Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003
Lim, J. M.-H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers‟ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002
Lin, L. (2014). Innovations in structuring article introductions: The case of applied linguistics. Iberica, 28, 129-154.
Madnani, N., Burstein, J., Elliot, N., Klebanov, B. B., Napolitano, D., Andreyev, S., & Schwarts, M. (2018). Writing mentor: Self-regulated writing feedback for struggling writers. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pages 113–117, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 20-26.
Marchetti, A., & O’Dell, R. (2015). Writing with mentors. Heinemann.
Muangsamai, P. (2018). Analysis of moves, rhetorical patterns and linguistic features in New Scientist articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.03.006
Nasihin, Ahmad., Arsyad, S., Harahap, A., & Wardhana, D. E. C. (2021). The use of genre based approach in training and mentoring for improving argument skills in research articles journal writing for social and humanity authors. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(4). 167-181. 10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.381
Olsen, T. B., Kyvik, S., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2005). The promotion to full professor-through competition or by individual competence?. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 299-316. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2005.9967153
Perris, K., & Corcoran, J. (2014). Mentorship in graduate student writing for publication. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 5(3), 1-3.
Pratiwi, S. N., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Rhetorical move and genre knowledge development of English and Indonesian abstracts: a comparative analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 885-900. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.21038
Rahman, M., Darus, S., & Amir, Z. (2017). Rhetorical Structure of Introduction in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. International Journal for Educational Studies, 9(2), 69-83.
Rochma, A. F., Triastuti, A., & Ashadi, A. (2020). Rhetorical styles of introduction in English Language Teaching (ELT) research articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28593
Rorstad, K., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Publication rate expressed by age, position gender and academic – A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of Infometrics, 9, 317-333. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.003
Safnil. (2000). Rhetorical structure analysis of the Indonesian research articles. [Unpublished thesis], Australian National University
Safnil. (2003). The rhetorical style of Indonesian research article introduction: A genre analysis study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 12(1), 27-62.
Saricaoglu, A., Bilki, Z., & Plakans, L. (2021). Syntactic complexity in learner-generated research paper introductions: Rhetorical functions and level of move/ step realization. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101037
Sasvari, P., Bakacsi, G., & Urbanovics, A. (2022). Scientific career tracks and publication performance – relationships discovered in the Hungarian academic promotion system. Heliyon, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159
Shehzad, W. (2012). Introduction of computer science research paper: Divergence from CARS. Kashmir Journal of Language Research. 15(2), 19-39.
Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10 (4), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.004
Shukri, N. A. (2014). Second Language Writing and Culture: Issues and Challenges from the Saudi Learners’ Perspective. Arab World English Journal, 5(3), 190-207.
Sun, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2022). “Establish a niche” via negation: A corpus based study of negation within the Move 2 sections of PhD thesis introductions. Open Linguistics, 8(1), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0190
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genre: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. The University of Michigan Press.
Wakerkwa, D. A. P. (2025). Exploring rhetorical approaches in Indonesian master thesis introductions. Journal of English Education Program, 6(1), 24-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v6i1.72261
Wang, W & Yang, C. (2015). Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.002
Wannaruk, A., & Amnuai, W. (2016). A Comparison of Rhetorical Move Structure of Applied Linguistics Research Articles Published in International and National Thai Journals. RELC Jurnal, 47(2), 193-211. DOI: 10.1177/0033688215609230
Warsidi. (2024). The rhetorical model of Indonesian research article introductions (RAIs) in the law discipline: problems and opportunities. Journal of Language and Literature, 24(2), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.6455
Yonezawa, A. (2015). Connecting higher education research in Japan with the international academic community. Higher Education Policy, 28, 477-493. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.19