Emoticons Unveiled: A Multifaceted Analysis of Their Linguistic Impact
Main Article Content
Keywords
emoji, emoticons, digital communication, language evolution, linguistic impact
Abstract
This study aims to thoroughly investigate the linguistic impact of emojis and emoticons in modern written communication. This work attempts to shed light on these digital symbols’ linguistic structure, social implications, and evolution through a multidisciplinary research method. A mixed-methods approach was used in the research, integrating interdisciplinary viewpoints with quantitative and qualitative analyses. A vast amount of data was gathered from various digital communication channels, such as email exchanges, messaging apps, and social media. A sizable collection of text messages with emojis and emoticons was assembled. Emotional cons and emojis were categorized using linguistic analysis, breaking down their structure into visual components and repeating patterns. Their grammatical and syntactic effects on written language were also evaluated in this investigation. The findings indicate that using emojis in writing positively correlates with emotional expressiveness. This implies that when people wish to express emotions and subtlety in their messages, they typically utilize more emoticons. They enhance digital etiquette, reduce misunderstandings, improve emotional connection, and foster cross-cultural understanding. Emoticons are a global visual language that helps people communicate, create empathy, and navigate digital communication.
Downloads
References
Ali, A. H., & Hamdi, H. Q. (2019). A pragmatic study of irony on some British and Iraqi TV comic Shows. In Journal of Language Studies (Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 28–48). https://doi.org/10.25130/LANG.V1I4.43
Allami, H., & Naeimi, A. (2011). A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.010
Alzeer, G. (2018). Types and dynamics of gendered space: a case of Emirati female learners in a single-gender context. Gender and Education, 30(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1205183
Anderson, K. E. (2020). Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: it is time to talk about TikTok. Library Hi Tech News, 37(4), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2020-0001
Arafah, B. (2019). Linguistic functions of emoji in social media communication. Opcion, 35, 558–574. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85077561022
Arrosid, I., Munandar, A., & Mada, U. G. (2018). Illocutionary Acts in Online Airline Advertising Slogans. 5(1), 46–54.
Attridge, D. (2004). The singularity of literature. In The Singularity of Literature. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420447
Baggia, A. (2022). Emoticons in student-professor email communication. Comunicar, 30(73), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.3916/C73-2022-10
Baoill, A. O. (2011). Regulation, Awareness, Empowerment: Young People and Harmful Media Content in the Digital Age. In Journal of International Communication (Vol. 17, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2011.556086
Belousov, K. I. (2023). Word2Vec- and semantic graph modeling of emoticons and emoji use in internet communication texts. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-2-47-62
Benavides-Vanegas, F. S. (2020). Emoticons, memes and cyberbullying: gender equality in Colombia. Social Semiotics, 30(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731169
Bou-Franch, P., & Blitvich, P. G.-C. (2019). Analyzing Digital Discourse New Insights and Future Directions.
Bradt, J. (2013). Mixed methods research in music therapy research. Journal of Music Therapy, 50(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/50.2.123
Brito, P. Q. (2020). What kind of emotions do emoticons communicate? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(7), 1495–1517. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0136
Brock, A. (2018). Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816677532
Bromberg, M. (2020). Reading between the text(s) - Interpreting emoji and emoticons in the Australian criminal law context. In New Criminal Law Review (Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 655–686). https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2020.23.4.655
Chendeb, H. M. (2019). Linguistic politeness across Arabic, French, and English languages. In Journal of Arts and Humanities (Vol. 8, Issue 12, pp. 57–72). https://doi.org/10.18533/JOURNAL.V8I12.1783
Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (2011). Linguistic Society of America Hearers and Speech Acts HEARERS AND SPEECH ACTS been fully examined . Consider requests , such as this one from ’ Othello ’: as we is an attempt by Othello to get the ’ hearer ’ H to go with him . This , of course , has an au. 58(2), 332–373.
Cristina Adornetti. (2012). Why Philosophical Pragmatics Needs Clinical Pragmatics. HUmana. Mente Journal of Philosphical Studies, 23, 159–174.
Dambros, C. (2020). The role of environmental filtering, geographic distance and dispersal barriers in shaping the turnover of plant and animal species in Amazonia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29(13), 3609–3634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02040-3
Dandannavar, P. S. (2020). Emoticons and Their Effects on Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data. In EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing (pp. 191–201). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19562-5_19
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2014). Emoticons and Illocutionary Force. Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning, 2, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_8
Ferri, G. (2018). Intercultural communication: Critical approaches and future challenges. In Intercultural Communication: Critical Approaches and Future Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73918-2
Fetzer, A., & Osiho, E. (2011). Context and Contexts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R. K., & Turner, H. A. (2007). Re-victimization patterns in a national longitudinal sample of children and youth. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(5), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.012
Fischer, B. (2021). Emoji as Affective Symbols: Affective Judgments of Emoji, Emoticons, and Human Faces Varying in Emotional Content. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645173
Gass, Su. M., & Neu, J. (1996a). Relevance , Pragmatics and Interpretation. Mouton de Gruyter.
Gass, Su. M., & Neu, J. (1996b). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter.
Gruyter, M. De. (2005). Politeness in Language.
Hazzan, M. K. (2022). Deception in the era of digital technologies and the distortion of reality and facts: An X-Ray of Nigerian peculiarities. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221124002
Headley, M. G. (2020). Multilevel Mixed Methods Research Designs: Advancing a Refined Definition. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819844417
Hegner, S. M. (2021). Emoticons are not for everyone: The role of congruence between hotel brand positioning strategies and communication style in enhancing customers’ brand attitude and booking intention. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 21(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358421993901
Hickey, L. (2014). The pragmatics of style. The Pragmatics of Style, 21, 1–207. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857381
Hisarciklilar, O., & Boujut, J. F. (2009). A Speech Act Theory-based information model to support design communication through annotations. Computers in Industry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.02.014
Howman, H. E. (2020). The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1729–1744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820922804
Hristova, S. (2018). Gender peculiarities of the speech etiquette of aristocracy of the XIX century - Russian-English parallels (sociolinguistic aspect). Ezikov Svyat, 17(1), 97–105. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068750834&origin=inward
Hsu, S. Y. (2019). The effects of international email and Skype interactions on computer-mediated communication perceptions and attitudes and intercultural competence in Taiwanese students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4209
Huang, G. H. (2020). Helpful or harmful? A double-edged sword of emoticons in online review helpfulness. Tourism Management, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104135
Jayawarna, D. (2021). A Gendered Life Course Explanation of the Exit Decision in the Context of Household Dynamics. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 45(6), 1394–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720940123
Jelinčić, D. A. (2020). When heritage speaks t-emoticons: Emotional experience design in heritage tourism. In A Research Agenda for Heritage Tourism (pp. 219–234). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903522.00024
Jung, B. (2022). The impact of belongingness and graphic-based emoticon usage motives on emoticon purchase intentions for MIM: an analysis of Korean KakaoTalk users. Online Information Review, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2020-0036
Kalbaska, N. (2019). Editorial: Fashion communication: Between tradition and digital transformation. In Studies in Communication Sciences (Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 269–285). https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2018.02.005
Kaneko, D. (2019). EmojiGrid: A 2D pictorial scale for cross-cultural emotion assessment of negatively and positively valenced food. In Food Research International (Vol. 115, pp. 541–551). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.049
Kang, C. (2022). Korean Emoticons: Understanding How Subtle Emotional Differences Are Evoked Online. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (pp. 121–125). https://doi.org/10.1145/3500868.3559463
Kavanagh, B. (2021). A study on how cultural and gender parameters affect emoticon distribution, usage and frequency in American and Japanese online discourse. In Pragmatics and Beyond New Series (Vol. 318, pp. 287–320). https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.10kav
Kissine, M. (2013). From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Koch, T. K. (2022). Age and gender in language, emoji, and emoticon usage in instant messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106990
Kraft, K. (2018). A language ideological landscape: The complex map in international companies in Denmark. In English in Business and Commerce: Interactions and Policies (Vol. 6, pp. 46–72). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501506833-003
Lee, J. g. (2021). Cheerful encouragement or careful listening: The dynamics of robot etiquette at Children’s different developmental stages. Computers in Human Behavior, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106697
Lee, S. J. (2018). An Integrated Model of Pop Culture Fans’ Travel Decision-Making Processes. Journal of Travel Research, 57(5), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517708619
Lee, Y. I. (2022). Image Framing, Emoticons, and Sharing Intention for Health-Related Posts on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0002
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
Leśniak, E. (2021). The Role of Emoticons in the Comprehension of Emotional and Non-emotional Messages in Dyslexic Youth – A Preliminary Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693287
Li, M. (2020). Psychological impact of health risk communication and social media on college students during the covid-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.2196/20656
Li, Q., Cross, D., & Smith, P. K. (2011). Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives. books.google.com. Li, Y. (2023). Should a luxury Brand’s Chatbot use emoticons? Impact on brand status. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(3), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2104
McHaney, R. (2021). Influence of emoticons on deception detection: An empirical exploration. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2021.100001
Muliastrini, N. K. E. (2019). Penguatan Literasi Baru (Literasi Data, Teknologi, Dan SDM/Humanisme) Pada Guru-Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan …. https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya/article/view/354
Multilingualism, multimodality and methodology: Linguistic landscape research in the context of assemblages, ideologies and (in)visibility: An introduction. (2018). In Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Linguistic Diversity, Multimodality and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource (pp. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.21832/PUTZ2159
Noll, A. (2020). How to Overcome Reading Barriers in Inclusive Mathematics Instructions—an Empirical Comparison of Visual and Linguistic Support. Journal Fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 41(1), 157–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00158-z
Norrick, N. R., & Chiaro, D. (2009). Humor in Interaction. In 2009. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pakarinen, S. (2018). Multiple language signage in linguistic landscapes and students’ language practices: A case study from a language immersion setting. Linguistics and Education, 44, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.005
Palmer, A. D. (2019). The impact of communication impairments on the social relationships of older adults: Pathways to psychological well-being. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0495
Paquette, D. (2016). Anderson Cooper told Trump ‘That is sexual assault.’ The Justice Department agrees. Washington Post.
Park, J. (2023). How to build rapport in online space: using online chat emoticons for qualitative interviewing in feminist research. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2022-0158
Park, J. R. (2020). Emoticons and non-verbal communications across Arabic, English, and Korean Tweets. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2020-0021
Parson, L. (2019). Digital media responses to a feminist scholarly article: a critical discourse analysis. Feminist Media Studies, 19(4), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1468348
Picione, R. D. L. (2021). The Dynamic Nature of the Human Psyche and its Three Tenets: Normativity, Liminality and Resistance—Semiotic Advances in Direction of Modal Articulation Sensemaking. Human Arenas, 4(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00212-3
Power, A. (2014). What is social media? British Journal of Midwifery. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2014.22.12.896
Prayitno, H. J., Kusmanto, H., Nasucha, Y., Rahmawati, L. E., Jamaluddin, N., Samsuddin, S., & Ilma, A. A. (2019). The Politeness Comments on The Indonesian President Jokowi Instagram Official Account Viewed From Politico Pragmatics and The Character Education Orientation in The Disruption Era. In Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 52–71). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. https://doi.org/10.23917/IJOLAE.V1I2.8785
Ptaszynski, M. (2020). Automatically Estimating Meaning Ambiguity of Emoticons. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 948, pp. 411–416). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_54
Purwati, P., & Gunawan, I. (2019). Kesantunan Berbahasa di Era Digital: Tinjauan Analisis Moral Pada Komentar Berita Sepakbola di Akun Instagram Pengamat sepak bola. In IJAS: Indonesian Journal of Arabic Studies (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 76–88). IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. https://doi.org/10.24235/IJAS.V1I1.4908
Rachdito, E. B. (2022). Emoticons as Self-Disclosure in Social Media and Its Meaning for People Who are Deaf. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development, 32(4), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.47985/dcidj.471
Revita, I. (2020). Politeness strategies of minangkabau ethnic in Indonesia. Asian ESP Journal, 16, 13–34.
Revita, Ike. (2013). Pragmatic Force Behind the Utterance of English Department Students in Seminar Class Discussion. Linguistika Kultura, 6(3), 1–9.
Revita, Ike. (2015a). Communicative Approach in Teaching English for 3rd Year English Department Students: Advantages and Weaknesses. Indonesian JELT, 10(2), 18–33.
Revita, Ike. (2015b). Pragmatic Paradox: The Portrait of Minangkabau Women in Communication. Tutur: Cakrawala Kajian Bahasa-Bahasa Nusantara, 1(2), 127–137.
Revita, Ike, Marwati, S., Mardhiah, A., & Ayumi. (2020). Maxims of Politeness Performed by Female Sellers at Traditional Market in Sumatera Barat. Arbitrer, 7(1), 8–15. https://arbitrer.fib.unand.ac.id/index.php/arbitrer/article/view/169/113
Revita, Ike, Trioclarise, R., & Anggreiny, N. (2017). Politeness Strategies of The Panders in Women Trafficking. Buletin Al-Turas, XXIII(1), 191–210.
Revita, Ike, Trioclarise, R., & Legino, R. (2022). Politeness Performed by Four Female in “Imperfect The Series.” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI8), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI8.3917
Sabater, C. P. (2017). Linguistic accommodation in online communication: The role of language and gender. Revista Signos, 50(94), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342017000200265
Sabrian, R., Revita, I., & Sastra, G. (2019). Women’s Speech In A State of Anger: A Neuropragmatic Study. Jurnal Arbitrer, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.6.1.15-27.2019
Sampietro, A. (2020). Use and Interpretation of Emoji in Electronic-Mediated Communication: A Survey. Visual Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2019.1707086
Savela, T. (2018). The advantages and disadvantages of quantitative methods in schoolscape research. Linguistics and Education, 44, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.09.004
Savski, K. (2021). Language policy and linguistic landscape Identity and struggle in two southern Thai spaces. Linguistic Landscape, 7(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.20008.sav
Shaari, A. H. (2020). Accentuating illocutionary forces: Emoticons as speech act realization strategies in a multicultural online communication environment. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 26(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2601-10
Shi, L., & Stevens, G. D. (2021). Vulnerable populations in the United States. books.google.com.
Smith, K. (2020). How Culture and Biology Interact to Shape Language and the Language Faculty. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 690–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12377
Suganob-Nicolau, M. F. (2016). Swear words among young learners: A case study of the elementary students. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v11i2.1493
Szeto, M. D. (2022). Emojis and Emoticons in Health Care and Dermatology Communication: Narrative Review. In JMIR Dermatology (Vol. 5, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2196/33851
Teh, P. L. (2020). Relationships between emoticon usage and recipient groups in students’ text messages. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 300–304). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429127
Thomson, A. (2019). Sport event legacy: A systematic quantitative review of literature. In Sport Management Review (Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 295–321). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.011
Togans, L. C. J. (2021). Digitally saving face: An experimental investigation of cross-cultural differences in the use of emoticons and emoji. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.016
Unni, Z. (2021). Shelter in Place, Connect Online: Trending TikTok Content During the Early Days of the U.S. COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(5), 863–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.02.012
Vashisht, G. (2020). Emoticons & emojis based sentiment analysis: The last two decades! International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 6398–6405. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85082925419
Vergis, N. (2020). Factors in the perception of speaker politeness: The effect of linguistic structure, imposition and prosody. Journal of Politeness Research, 16(1), 45–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0008
Walters, J. (2005). Bilingualism. Lawrence Erlbauam Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612038
WETZLER, S. (2001). Linguistics, Pragmatics and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Therapists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(5), 827-a-828. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.827-a
Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649
Whitburn, J. (2020). Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13381
Williamson, K., Given, L. M., & Scifleet, P. (2018). Qualitative data analysis. In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00019-4
Wutich, A. (2019). Data Collection in Cross-cultural Ethnographic Research. Field Methods, 31(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19837397
Yamaguchi, M. et al. (2014). Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition (Issue 321). Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Zou, H. (2022). Sentiment Classification Method Based on Blending of Emoticons and Short Texts. Entropy, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/e24030398
