Javanese Silly Gags on Daily Communication on Social Media: Pragmatic Meanings and Functions Approach
Main Article Content
Keywords
Meanings and functions, silly gags, cyberpragmatic perspectives, Javanese
Abstract
This qualitative descriptive study aims to explore the pragmatic significance of rarely researched Javanese silly gags. The primary objective is to examine the markers and implications of these gags in daily communication, particularly focusing on their various categories. Utilizing social media fragments as the primary source, the research employs the note-taking method for listening. Subsequent steps include the identification, classification, and characterization of Javanese silly gags into five distinct categories: (1) Silly jokes for enthusiasm, (2) Silly jokes for sarcasm, (3) Silly jokes for satire, (4) Silly jokes for exasperation, and (5) Silly jokes for enigmatic humor. The equivalent analysis method is then applied, specifically using contextual equivalents through a comparative linking technique for in-depth data analysis. The emphasis on context is considered a crucial factor in conducting purpose-oriented pragmatic studies. The analysis reveals valuable insights into the diverse functions of Javanese silly gags, showcasing their significance in daily communication. The identified categories provide a comprehensive understanding of how these gags serve various purposes, from expressing enthusiasm to conveying sarcasm, satire, exasperation, and enigmatic humor. The social media fragments prove to be rich sources for uncovering the nuances of Javanese silly gags and their markers. The findings of this study shed light on the multifaceted nature of Javanese silly gags, highlighting their importance in preserving a unique form of humor. The study emphasizes the potential threat posed by the younger generation’s lack of comprehension. It underscores the need to preserve and understand Javanese silly gags in the evolving landscape of communication. Overall, this research contributes to the broader understanding of pragmatic aspects in Javanese humor, emphasizing the cultural and communicative significance of these often-overlooked forms of expression.
Downloads
References
Berger, P., Bitsch, F., & Falkenberg, I. (2021). Humor in Psychiatry: Lessons From Neuroscience, Psychopathology, and Treatment Research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681903
Bischetti, L., Canal, P., & Bambini, V. (2021). Funny but aversive: A large-scale survey of the Italian population’s emotional response to Covid-19 humor during the lockdown. Lingua, 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102963
Bitterly, T. B. (2022). Humor and power. In Current Opinion in Psychology (Vol. 43). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.017
Burger, C. (2022). Humor Styles, Bullying Victimization and Psychological School Adjustment: Mediation, Moderation and Person-Oriented Analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811415
Cesaria, A., Kemal, E., & Adnan, M. (2023). How Does The Bilingualism Improve the Student English Ability : a Discourse Case Study on Higher Education. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(02), 122–136.
Chernobrov, D. (2022). Strategic humour: Public diplomacy and comic framing of foreign policy issues. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211023958
Crandall, E., & Basturkmen, H. (2004). Evaluating pragmatics-focused materials. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.1.38
Díaz-Pérez, F. J. (2013). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context by Francisco Yus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6250-3_14
Eisend, M. (2022). The influence of humor in advertising: Explaining the effects of humor in two-sided messsages. Psychology and Marketing, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21634
Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Negative Impoliteness and Reconstruction of Identity: Cyberpragmatics Analysis of Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Arab Youtube Channel. Jurnal Arbitrer, 8(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.8.2.168-179.2021
Fominykh, M., Prasolova-Førland, E., Morozov, M., & Gerasimov, A. (2011). Virtual campus in the context of an educational virtual city. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(2).
Halim, M., & Zulfahmi, M. (2023). How Form of Discourse on Traditional Games and Music in Overcoming Bullying in Schools. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(01), 1–10. https://jurnal.ppjb-sip.org/index.php/jpdr/article/view/325
Harley, D. (2013). Scholarly communication: Cultural contexts, evolving models. In Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243622
Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 10, Issue JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts, and world englishes. In Cultures, Contexts, and World Englishes. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891346
Kartika, D., Rahardi, R. K., Aziz, M., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Depicting reflections of power on illocutionary acts of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe ’ s speeches on Covid -19. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63078
Kunjana Rahardi, R. (2023). Social–Societal Context Element Changes in Cyberpragmatics Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2771–2779. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.06
Kong, D. T., Cooper, C. D., & Sosik, J. J. (2019). The state of research on leader humor. Organizational Psychology Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386619846948
Kurniasih, N., Rahmansyah, S., & Kurnia N, I. (2019). Politeness strategy to prevent and resolve cyber-conflicts among indonesian internet users: a cyberpragmatics approach. Humanus. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v18i1.103049
Lau, C., Chiesi, F., & Saklofske, D. H. (2022). The heart of humor: A network analysis of the temperamental basis of humor and humor personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111253
Luevano, V. X., Pablo, J. N., Velazquez, M. L., Chance, B., & Ramirez, B. (2021). Attachment as a predictor of attraction to humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110634
Maruti, E. S. (2022). Direct Open Strategy in Javanese Apology Speech Act: a Pragmatic Study. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 1(2), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v1i2.193
Maryelliwati, M., Rahmat, W., & Kemal, E. (2018). A Reality of Minangkabau Language and Literature and Its Transformation to A Creation of Performance Works. Gramatika STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 4(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2018.v4i1.2422
Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How Competence of Production , Attention , Retention , Motivation , and Innovation Can Improve Students ’ Scientific Writing Skills. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 368–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Research design and research methods. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781544304533
Pearson, L. (2012). Yus, Francisco. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2011. Pp. xiv, 353. $143.00, cloth. ISBN 978-90-272-5619-5. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01417.x
Pflaeging, J., Wildfeuer, J., & Bateman, J. A. (2021). Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. In Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110725001
Pristianingrum, S., & Damayanti, R. (2022). Pragmatic Dimension of Semiotics in Song Lyrics Dimensi Pragmatik Dalam Semiotika Pada Lirik Lagu. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(2), 98–107. https://jurnal.ppjb-sip.org/index.php/jpdr/index
Putra, A. A., Rahmat, W., & Tatalia, R. G. (2021). The Language of Narcissistic Tendencies In Youtube Users a Psycopragmatic Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v1i2.182
Putri, N. A., Tiawati, R. L., & Nitia, S. D. (2023). Exploring Mistake of Language Discourse That Arises When Learners of Indonesian For Foreign Speaker ( BIPA ) Fatoni University. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(01), 59–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v3i1.342
Rahardi, R. K., & Setyaningsih, Y. (2019). Contextualizing Local Values of Children‟s Games in the Perspective of Ecopragmatics to Enhance Culture-Specific Based Communication. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.a1096.109119
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2019). Pragmatic perspective on phatic functions and language dignity. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1039.0585C19
Rahardi, R K. (2018). Phatic Language in a Specific Culture Perspective in the Context of Internationalization of the Indonesian Language. KnE Social Sciences, 3(9), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2720
Rahardi, K. (2019). Extralinguistic context roles in determining meanings of javanese phatic expression mboten: a sociopragmatic perspective. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v3i1.1898
Rahardi, K. (2019). Integrating Social, Societal, Cultural, and Situational Context to Develop Pragmatics Course Learning Materials: Preliminary Study. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2).
Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Emotikon sebagai konteks maksud dalam cyberpragmatics (Emoticons as an Intended Context in Cyberpragmatics) (Vol. 27, Issue 2).
Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Depicting Pragmatic Meanings of Covid-19 Hoaxes in Social Media: Cyber-Pragmatic Perspective Mendeskripsikan Makna Pragmatik Hoaks Covid-19 Dalam Media Sosial: Perspektif Cyber-Pragmatik. Jurnal Kata : Penelitian Tentang Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, Volume 4,(7).
Rahardi, R. K. (2021). Ilokusi-ilokusi hoaks covid-19 di media sosial dalam perspektif cyber-pragmatics/covid-19 hoax illocutions in instagram in the perspective of cyberpragmatics. Aksara, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v32i2.561.313-322
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2022). Triadicities of Indonesian Phatic Functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 982–987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.22
Rahardi, R. Kunjana, Rahmat, W., & Kurniawan, Y. (2023). Pseudo-Directive Speech Act in the Javanese Language: Culture-Specific Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00223
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2006). Method: Approach, Design, and Procedure. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586789
Rooij, R. van. (2004). Formal Pragmatics. Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.04.009
Sari, N., Rahmat, W., & Samsiarni. (2021). News of Violence In Posmetro Padang Daily, A Study of Discourse Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 1(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdrv1i1.132
Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Quality of arguments used in the first-round presidential debate: Critical pragmatics and stephen Toulmin’s perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1102.0585C19
Setyaningsih, Y., & Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Argument Constellation in Journal Articles: Toulmin Stephen Perspective (Konstelasi Argumen Dalam Artikel Jurnal: Perspektif Stephen Toulmin). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2020.v6i2.4079
Sultan, Rapi, M., Basri, M. B., Mangila, B. B., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Texts and Tasks in Indonesian Language Textbooks: Do They Support Indonesian Students in the International Reading Literacy Test? International Journal of Language Education, 7(3), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i3.56017
Saricali, M., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., Gocet-Tekin, E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2022). Fear of COVID-19, Mindfulness, Humor, and Hopelessness: A Multiple Mediation Analysis. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00419-5
Science, L., Company, P., Long, M. H., Canagarajah, S., Peterson, R. A., Nagel, J., Lu, S., Fine, G. A., Pavlenko, A., Eva Lam, W. S., Warriner, D. S., Poveda, D., Gonzalez, N., de Souza, L. M. T. M., McNamara, T., Iwasaki, S., Van Lier, leo, Lemke, L., Modern, T., … Backus, A. (2017). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90022-X
Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2015). Nonhuman Primate Communication, Pragmatics, and the Origins of Language. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/679674
Shin, H., Bunosso, I., & Levine, L. R. (2023). The influence of chatbot humour on consumer evaluations of services. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12849
Shin, Y. S., Masís-Obando, R., Keshavarzian, N., Dáve, R., & Norman, K. A. (2021). Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: On Mars and underwater. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01835-3
Shoda, V. P., & Yamanaka, T. (2022). A Study on Instructional Humor: How Much Humor Is Used in Presentations? Behavioral Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12010007
Streeck, J. (1984). Embodied contexts, transcontextuals, and the timing of speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90067-5
Tiawati, R. L., Rahmat, W., Kemal, E., & Chen, W. (2022). The Importance of Guidance In Understanding Cultural Discourse In Thinking and Speaking For Foreign Students In BIPA Program. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v2i1.203
Wälti, M. J., Woolley, D. G., & Wenderoth, N. (2019). Reinstating verbal memories with virtual contexts: Myth or reality? PLoS ONE, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214540
Wincana, G., Rahmat, W., & Tatalia, R. G. (2022). Linguistic Tendencies of Anorexia Nervosa on Social Media Users. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr/v2i1.185
Yeo, S. K., & McKasy, M. (2021). Emotion and humor as misinformation antidotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002484118
Yingxuan, L., Damayanti, V. S., Sastromiharjo, A., & Mulyati, Y. (2023). Development of Graded Vocabulary Parameters for Chinese BIPA based on Frequency. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 03(02), 231–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v3i2.712
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics, Internet-mediated communication in context (A. Fetzer, Ed.; 1st ed.). John Benjamin Publishing Company. https://benjamins.com
