The Relationship between Writing Proficiency in English and Metacognitive Awareness of Writing Strategies among EFL University Students

Main Article Content

El Mehdi El Madani
Mohammed Larouz
Mustapha Fagroud
Zayneb Saadallah

Keywords

Language learning, metacognition, writing , metacognitive awareness, witing strategies

Abstract

Scholarly interest in the interplay between metacognition and language learning has notably surged. The expanding corpus of literature uniformly acknowledges the pivotal role that metacognitive knowledge occupies within the framework of language education. Precisely, the metacognitive awareness concerning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning strategies empowers learners to supervise, regulate, and optimize their educational endeavors. Metacognitive knowledge encompasses an awareness of one’s linguistic proficiency and the strategies pertinent for its enhancement. Equally, a deficiency in such awareness poses significant impediments to the language learning trajectory. Against this backdrop, the present study probes the nexus between metacognitive knowledge and language learning. the specific objective of the current study is to explore the correlation between EFL college students’ English writing proficiency and their writing metacognitive awareness. In order to reach this goal, a language proficiency test in writing and a Metacognitive Awareness Writing Questionnaire (MAWQ) were employed to collect the data. The participants in the study included 94 university students belonging to the department of English studies at the faculty of Letters and Human Sciences of Meknes and the Higher school for Training and Education of Kenitra. To analyze the collected data, the study made use of various statistical tools, including Simple Linear Regression and Pearson product-moment correlation. The results of the explored connection presented that there is a significant positive relationship between students’ writing performance and their metacognitive awareness of writing, with a ρ -value of 0.793. The results also showed that writing metacognitive awareness could predict 62% of the variability in writing ability. This study has also precipitated a range of implications related to pedagogy and methodology, alongside recommendations for teachers of English, syllabus designers, academic English studies departments, and coming scholarly inquiries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing: with commentaries by Ronald T. Kellogg & John R. Hayes (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.
Anderson, N. J. (2012). Metacognition: Awareness of language learning. In Psychology for language learning (pp. 169-187). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Balta, E. E. (2018). The Relationships among Writing Skills, Writing Anxiety and Metacognitive Awareness. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 233-241.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.
El Madani, E., & Larouz, M. (2020). An Investigation into the relationship between French and English reading abilities: freshmen students of the English department at meknes as a case study. International Journal of Advance Study and Research Work, 3(5), 30-48.
Farahian, M. (2015). Assessing EFL learners’ writing metacognitive awareness. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 39-51.
Farahian, M. (2017). Developing and validating a metacognitive writing questionnaire for EFL learners. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 736-750.
Farsani, M. A., Abdollahzadeh, E., & Beikmohammadi, M. (2019). Self-regulated Learning, Metacognitive Awareness, and Argumentative writing: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Writing & Pedagogy, 11(2).
Ferrari, M., Bouffard, T., & Rainville, L. (1998). What makes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers’ self-regulation of writing. Instructional Science, 26(6), 473-488.
Flower, L.S., & Hayes, J.R. (1980). The dynamic of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L.W. Gregg, & E.R. Steinberg (Eds). Cognitive processes in writing, (pp.31-50). Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum.
Graham, S., & R. Harris, K. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational psychologist, 35(1), 3-12.
Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Cognitive processes in writing: A framework. In B. Arfe, J. Dockrell, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia, or oral language problems (pp. 3–15). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Facilitating L2 writers’ metacognitive strategy use in argumentative writing using a process-genre approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1036831.
Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.
Karlen, Y. (2017). The development of a new instrument to assess metacognitive strategy knowledge about academic writing and its relation to self-regulated writing and writing performance. Journal of Writing Research, 9(1), 61-86.
Kim, M., Tian, Y., & Crossley, S. A. (2021). Exploring the relationships among cognitive and linguistic resources, writing processes, and written products in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100824.
Lin, S.-J. C., Monroe, B. W., & Troia, G. A. (2007). Development of writing knowledge in grades 2–8: A comparison of typically developing writers and their struggling peers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 207-230.
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition?. Phi delta kappan, 87(9), 696-699.
Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142-179.
Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9-30.
Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2009). The relationship between the discourse knowledge and the writing performance of elementary-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 37-50.
Ridley, D.S., Schutz, P.A., Glanz, R.S., and Weinstein, C.E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 293-306.
Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2007). The relationship between writing knowledge and writing performance among more and less skilled writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 231-247.
Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Examining the effects of English as a foreign language student-writers’ metacognitive experiences on their writing performance. Current Psychology, 1-16.
Teng, F. (2016). Immediate and delayed effects of embedded metacognitive instruction on Chinese EFL students’ English writing and regulation of cognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 289-302.
Teng, F. (2020). Tertiary-level students’ English writing performance and metacognitive awareness: A group metacognitive support perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 551-568.
Wang, J., Spencer, K., & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies in learning Chinese as a foreign language. System, 37(1), 46-56.
Wu, H. Y. (2006). Metacognitive experiences in college students’ EFL writing. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (3),28–30.
Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2021). Integrating active learning activities and metacognition into STEM writing courses. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(4), 902-907.