A Linguistic Analysis of The Use of Humour in Adébáyò̩ Fálétí’s Writings
Main Article Content
Keywords
linguistic perspectives, humour, strategies, interactional phenomenon, social discourse
Abstract
This study discussed strategies of humour in Adébáyọ̀ Àkàndé Fálétí’s writings. It interrogates how humour as a universal human interactional phenomenon is used to particularly entertain, checkmate human excesses and chastise societal ills in a mild manner. It is noted that among the living things only human beings laugh and humour excites laughter but it is not every humour that leads to laughter. Therefore, for humour to be effectively appreciated, it must be properly situated in its social context. The theoretical framework for this study is based on Thomas Veatch postulation of humour as a phenomenon made up of congruous and incongruous elements of socially typical and infringement of the prejudiced ethical standard. This framework is adopted to study Faleti’s use of humour to entertain, criticize human actions and chastise societal ills. It was out that humour as a form of lampoon is used euphemistically or ironically not as a means to destroy the society but to improve it. Faleti uses humour as an effective weapon of criticism and a subtle source of laughter to entertain the audience and to curb aberrations in the society. Humour in Faleti’s writings is used in a calm and amusing manner and the end result is laughter, although beneath the laughter is the lampoon of social misdemeanours concealed in the use of light-hearted constructions. Faleti has succeeded in espousing various methods of coping with serious and tense situation through the use of strategies of humour.
Downloads
References
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Benacka, E. (2016). Rhetoric, humour and the public sphere: From Socrates to Stephen Colbert. New York, Lexington books.
Christopher, S. (2015). Gallows/Black Humour. https://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/28900/1/28900.pd.\
Dorde, C. (2022). Relationship between humour styles and Alternative five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 194, 111625.
Fálétí, A. (1979). Ogun Àwíté̩lè̩. Ibadan, university press limited.
Fálétí, A. (1972). Bas̩ò̩run Gáà. Ibadan, university press limited.
Fálétí, A. (1980). Wó̩n Rò Pé Wèrè Ni. Ibadan, university press limited.
Fálétí, A. (1975). O̩mo̩ Olókùn E̩s̩in. Ibadan, university press limited.
Franklyn, B.S. (2006). Towards a theory of postmodern humour: South park as carnivalesque postmodern narrative impulse. [Online] Available: https://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz/
Giorgadze, M. (2018). Linguistic feature of pun, its typology and classification. European scientific Journal, Vol.2. PP:1857-7881.
Iverson, K.R. (2013). Humour and Mark: Performance and the Use of Laughter in the Second Gospel. Cambridge, University press.
Marina, B.A. Vadim, P. (2021). The Semiology of Humour: Developing the “Counter-Sign” Model. European Journal of humour research, Vol.9, No.2, 7-25
Mulder, M.P. & Nijholt, A. (2022). Humour research: State of the Art, project on humour in human-computer Instruction. University of Twente, Netherlands.
O̩látúnjí, O.O (1984). Features of Yorùbá oral poetry. Ibadan, University Press Ltd.
Olátúnjí, O.O (1982). Adebayo Fálétí: A study of his poems. Ibadan, Heinman Educational books Nig. Ltd.
Polimeni, J. & Reiss, J.P. (2006). The first joke: Exploring the evolutionary origins of humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 4: 347-366.
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humour. Dordrecht: Reidal.
Scheel, T. (2017). Humour at work in teams, leadership, negotiations, learning and Health, Flensburg, Euro-University at (PP:9-29).
Veatch, T. (1998). A Theory of Humour. International Journal of Humor, 11 (2): 161- 215.
Waters, M. (1984). The comic Irishman. Albany State University of New York press
