Exploring Cultural Dynamics: Comparative Analysis of Argumentative English Essays Among Pakistani and Chinese Learners using Multidimensional Analysis
Main Article Content
Keywords
ICNALE, argumentative essays, Pakistani, Chinese, multidimensional analysis
Abstract
This study aims at exploring comparative linguistic variation across Pakistani and Chinese learners’ English argumentative essays using a multidimensional analysis (MDA) approach. This study uses a quantitative approach to describing co-occurring linguistic features. The corpus comprising 400 Pakistani and Chinese learners’ essays used in this study has been electronically derived from an online source, ICNALE. The representative corpus has been tagged and analysed through MAT tagger. This study addresses how the language of Pakistani and Chinese learners vary comparatively linguistically; it also explores their linguistic characterization which distinguishes their variety through their co-occurring linguistic features using MD analysis by utilizing five dimensions. The study is restricted to only two countries i.e., Pakistan and China, and the size of the data is considerably more restricted to one sub-register of essay writing, namely, argumentative essays. The results indicate that the language of Pakistani learners’ essays is informational but Chinese learners’ essays are involved in dimension 1 Chinese learners’ essays are narrative whereas Pakistanis learners’ essays are non-narrative on dimension 2. Dimension 3 specifies that Pakistani learners’ essay writings implement that the text is independent of context and contains significant nominalizations while Chinese learners’ essay writings are context-dependent in nature. Dimension 4 indicates that Chinese learners’ essay writings are more explicit and persuasive specifying extensive use of modal verbs than Pakistani learners’ writings. The nature of Chinese learners’ essays is abstract, formal, and technical while Pakistani learners’ essays are non-abstract, objective, and natural on Dimension 5. This study has shed light on how learners acquire new words and expressions from reading different texts that identify various lexical grammatical aspects writers employ and serve as the fundamental source of variety in their language. The categories of dimensions are developed based on particular linguistic features that are over- or under-utilized by assessing the statistical data.
Downloads
References
Argamon, S. E. (2019). Computational Register Analysis and Synthesis. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1901.02543. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.02543
Azher, M., & Mahmood, M. (2018). Variation in Learner’s Argumentative Essays – A Multi-Dimensional Comparative Analysis.
Biber, D. (1985). Investigating Macroscopic Textual Variation Through Multifeature/Multidimensional Analyses, pp. 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.2.337
Biber, D. (1991). Variation Across Speech And Writing: Cambridge University Press, UK. ISBN: 0521320712
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions Of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison: Cambridge University Press, UK.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, And Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, UK.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1994). Corpus-Based Approaches to Issues in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 15(2), pp. 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.2.169
Biber, D., & Hared, M. (1992). Dimensions of Register Variation in Somali. Language Variation And Change, 4(1), pp. 41-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000065X
Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A Longitudinal Multidimensional Analysis of EAP Writing: Determining EAP Course Effectiveness. Journal Of English For Academic Purposes, 22, pp. 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005
De Sutter, G., & Lefer, M.-A. (2020). On the Need for A New Research Agenda for Corpus-Based Translation Studies: A Multi-Methodological, Multifactorial And Interdisciplinary Approach. Perspectives, 28(1), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1611891
Douglas, D. (1992). The Multi-Dimensional Approach to Linguistic Analyses of Genre Variation: An Overview of Methodology and Findings. Computers And The Humanities, 26(5), pp. 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136979
Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using Computer-Tagged Linguistic Features to Describe L2 Writing Differences. Journal Of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing. Journal Of Second Language Writing, 13(2), pp. 133-151. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2003). A Corpus-Based Investigation Of Scientific Research Articles: Linking Move Analysis With Multidimensional Analysis: Georgetown University.
Kim, J. E., & Nam, H. (2019). How Do Textual Features of L2 Argumentative Essays Differ Across Proficiency Levels? A Multidimensional Cross-Sectional Study. Reading And Writing, 32(9), pp. 2251-2279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09947-6
Lin, C. H., & Lin, Y. L. (2019a). Grammatical and Lexical Patterning of Make in Asian Learner Writing: A Corpus-Based Study of ICNALE. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal Of English Language Studies, 25(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-01
Lin, C. H., & Lin, Y. L. (2019b). Grammatical and Lexical Patterning of Make in Asian Learner Writing: A Corpus-Based Study of ICNALE. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal Of English Language Studies, 25, pp. 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-01
Liu, X., & Furneaux, C. (2014). A Multidimensional Comparison of Discourse Organization in English And Chinese University Students’ Argumentative Writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp. 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12013
Musarrat Azher, D., & Mehmood, M. A. (2016). Comparing Linguistic Features of Academic Discourse in Pakistani and British English: A Multidimensional Analysis, p. 284. ISSN: 1812-0687
Nini, A. (2019). The Multi-Dimensional Analysis Tagger. Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods And Current Issues, pp. 67-94. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0012
Rasheed, S., & Mehmood, A. (2014). The Use of Progressives in Pakistani Learners’ English: A Corpus Based Study. Journal Of Education And Practice, 5(6).
Rayson, P. E. (2003). Matrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis Through Corpus Comparison. Lancaster University, UK.
Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in Elementary Student Language: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective. Northern Arizona University, US.
Tabassum, R., Farooq, M., & Mahmood, M. (2021). Identifying Features of Pakistani Learners Writing. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2021(VI-III).13
Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Machts, N., & Möller, J. (2019). The Influence of Lexical Features on Teacher Judgements of ESL Argumentative Essays. Assessing Writing, 39, pp. 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003
Weigle, S. C., & Friginal, E. (2015). Linguistic Dimensions of Impromptu Test Essays Compared with Successful Student Disciplinary Writing: Effects of Language Background, Topic, and L2 Proficiency. Journal Of English For Academic Purposes, 18, pp. 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.03.006
Xiao, R. (2009). Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes. World Englishes, 28, pp. 421-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01606.x
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Ali Siddique, Government College University
Department of Applied Linguistics, Faisalabad