Ideology in Marine Ritual Discourse of Acehnese Speech Community
Main Article Content
Keywords
ideology, environment, ecolinguistics, social praxis, three dimensions
Abstract
This study is about what particular people belong to the particular ethnic have in mind as their ideology to see the environment, reflected from traditional fishing ritual in Acehnese speech community under the eco-linguistic perspective. In addition, with reference to social praxis, ecolinguistics recognizes three dimensions, namely ideological, sociological, and biological dimensions relating to the exploitation of the environment for fishing through ritual speech. The purpose of this study is to determine the ideology reflected in the speech. The study employed a qualitative research methodology, utilizing a phenomenological approach. The study makes use of verbal expressions expressed by naval commanders, gathered through a combination of participatory observation and comprehensive interviews at a central location of fish market and sanctuary in Banda Aceh, Aceh Indonesia. The data collected serve as the basis for the analysis and interpretation of the research findings. The respected ideology was then compared to the concept of ecosophy. The results of the analysis show that the ritual holistically contains the ideology of environmental preservation. The efforts to assist the natural, social, and spiritual preservations, specifically in marine environments, are obviously detected in the discourse. The ideology offered is in accordance with the concept of ecosophy, which includes beneficial discourse. However, part of the utterances also reflect the ambivalent discourse, but not the destructive one.
Downloads
References
Bang, J. Chr. and Door, J. (1993). Ecolinguistics: A Framework. Retrieved from: www.jcbang.dk/main/ecolinguistiks/Ecoling_AFramework1993.pdf
Bhattacherjee, M., and Sinha, S. (2021). Ecosophy through Jataka tales. Language and ecology. Retrieved from https://ecolinguistics-Association.org/journal
Bustamam, K and Ahmad. (2017). A Study of Panglima La’ot an Adat Institution in Aceh. Al Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies.Vol.55, No.1 pp 155-188. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.551.155-188
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. California: Sage Publication Inc.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Fill, A. & Peter Muhlhausler, (2001). The Ecolinguistic Reader, Language, Ecology and Environtment. London and New York: Continuum.
Genua, V. et.al. (2018). “Ideology of Nijo Text on the Specch Community of Lio Flore: Ecolinguistic Perspective”. E-Journal of Linguistics. Vol.12 No.1. P: 53-66. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eol/article/view/38185
Horvath, J. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Obama’s Political Discourse”. Accessed from https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~sbenus/Teaching/APTD/Horvath_CDO_Obama.pdf
Keraf, S. (2002). Etika Lingkungan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Lindo, A V & Bundsgaard (eds). (2000). Dialectical Ecolinguistics Tree Essays for the Symposium 30 Years of Language and Ecology in Graz December 2000. Austria: University of Odence Research Group for Ecology, Language and Ecology. https://www.jcbang.dk/main/ecolinguistics/Dialecticalecolinguistics.pdf
Mantiri,G.J.M.and Handayani, T. (2018). Dampak Ekologis Penggunaan Kalimat Indikatif pada Media Massa Online Papua: Tinjauan Ekolinguistik Kritis. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 7(2), 146-163. Doi: https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v712.607
Safir, E. (1912). Language and Environment. American Anthropologist. New Series. Vol.14, No.2 (Apr-Jun 1912) pp.226-242. https://www.jstor.org/stable/659930
Stibbe, A. (2007) Haiku and Beyond: Language, Ecology, and Reconnection with the Natural World. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People and Animals, 20 (2). pp. 101-112.ISSN 0892-7936. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303707X207891
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. London: Routledge.
Steffensen, S. V. (2007). Language, ecology and society: An introduction to Dialectical Linguistics. In J. C. Bang, J. Døør, S. V. Steffensen, & J. Nash (Eds.), Language, Ecology and Society: A Dialectical Approach (pp. 3-31). Bloomsbury Academic. https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/en/publications/language-ecology-and-society-an-introduction-to-dialectical-lingu
Van Dijk, T. (1995). Discourse Semantics and Ideology. Sage Journal. Vol.6, Issue 2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0957926595006002006 https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006
Wu, Y. (2018). “Ecological Discourse Analysis”. Advance in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR). 4th of International Conference of Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE).Vol. 181https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.163
Yazgan, P & Utku, D. (2017). “News Discourse and Ideology: Critical Analysis of Copenhagen Gang Wars’ online News”. Migration Letters. Vol.14. No. 1 pp 145-160 retrieved from www.migrationletters.com
Yuniawan, T., et.al. (2017). The Study of Critical Eco-Linguistic in Green Discourse: Prospective Eco-Linguistic Analysis. Humaniora, Vol.29.,N0.3. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.27441 https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/27441
Zang, R. & He, W. (2020). Human-Nature Relationship in Experiential Meaning: Transitivity System of Chinese from Ecolinguistic Perspective. Journal of World Languages. 6:3, 217-235, https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1819519
