Paradigm Shift of Language Revitalization in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Keywords
paradigm shift, language revitalization, local languages, philosophy
Abstract
Language revitalization as a linguistic social movement that aims to preserve and promote local languages, is experiencing a paradigm shift in Indonesia. These shifts can be seen from the aspect of language status objects. That is meant here is that the object of language status in language revitalization is not only languages with minority and endangered status. All local languages in Indonesia can be revitalized. Based on these conditions, this study explores the shift in the language revitalization paradigm in Indonesia. This aims to explain the structure of paradigm shift and provide an explanation for understanding language revitalization in its historical development in Indonesia. The study method uses qualitative methods with data collection techniques from the results of literature studies. Data analysis refers to Thomas Samuel Kuhn’s structure of the scientific revolution in terms of paradigm shift. As a result, the shift in the language revitalization paradigm in terms of the language status object is based on the heterogeneity of languages in Indonesia. Meanwhile, all languages in Indonesia must and have the right to be preserved in accordance with statutory regulations. This condition makes the government regulate language revitalization regulations that apply to all languages so that all languages in Indonesia receive the same treatment in the context of language preservation efforts.
Downloads
References
Ambarwari, A., Husni, E. M., & Mahayana, D. (2023). Perkembangan Metode Klasifikasi Citra Penginderaan Jauh dalam Perspektif Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(3), 465—473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i3.53865
Asrudin, A. (2017). Thomas Kuhn dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Realisme sebagai Paradigma. Global South Review, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.28830
Austin, P. K., & Sallabank, J. (1999). Introduction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975981.001
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2019). Bahasa dan Peta Bahasa di Indonesia (6th ed.). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Budiono, S., & Harimansyah, G. (2023). The Revitalisation of Tobati, an Endangered Language of Papua in Indonesia. In R. Valijarvi & L. Kahn (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Resources for Endangered Languages (p. 248—262). BRILL.
Budiono, S., & Noviani, E. (2023). Retta Language Revitalization Learning Materials in Alor Regency. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 51(2), 312–324. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v51i22023p312
Campbell, L., & Rehg, K. L. (2018). Introduction: Endangered Languages. In K. L. Rehg & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages (pp. xxviii–18). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190610029.013.3
Firdiyanti, S. I. (2023). Relevansi Teori Revolusi Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn Terhadap Transkasi Jual-Beli Online. Shar-E : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah, 9(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.37567/shar-e.v9i1.1687
Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistic: A Practical Introduction. Palgrave Macmilan.
Hinton, L., & Hale, K. (Eds.). (2001). The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. BRILL.
Hirata-Edds, T., & Peter, L. (2005). Issues in language revitalization. In Saving Languages (pp. 21–49). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615931.003
Imran, Jurlianti, M., & Yolferi. (2021). Diri Amba: Muatan Lokal Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 dalam Bahasa Melayu Langkat. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sumatra Utara.
Imran, & Sibarani, T. (2021). Cerita Rakyat Nias dalam Bahasa Nias, Bahasa Indonesia, dan Bahasa Inggris. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sumatra Utara.
Jones, M. C. (2015). Endangered Languages and New Technologies. Cambridge University Press.
Juliana, Albana, H., & Fitra, Y. (2021). Ahu Raphon Donganhu: Muatan Lokal Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 dalam Bahasa Batak Toba. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sumatra Utara.
Kamma, A. (2016). Usaha Pemertahanan dan Revitalisasi Bahasa Ponosakan. Kadera Bahasa, 8(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.47541/kaba.v8i2.33
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Pedoman Bagi Kepala Daerah dalam Pelestarian dan Pengembangan Bahasa Negara dan Bahasa Daerah, (2007).
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan T. (2022). Buku Saku Revitalisasi Bahasa. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/berita-detail/3428/kemendikbudristek-luncurkan-merdeka-belajar-17:-revitalisasi-bahasa-daerah
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Petunjuk Teknis Revitalisasi Bahasa. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
Mu’jizah. (2018). Preservasi dan Revitalisasi Bahasa dan Sastra Nafri, Papua: Sebuah Bahasa Hampir Punah. Aksara, 30(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v30i1.217.75-88
Musayyedah, Jerniati, Herianah, Syamsurijal, & Satyalaksana. (2021). Revitalisasi Bahasa Limola Berbasis Komunitas di Desa Sassa, Kabupaten Luwu Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
Olko, J., & Sallabank, J. (Eds.). (2021). Revitalizing Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641142
Rau, D. V., & Florey, M. (Eds.). (2007). Documenting and Revitalizing Austronesian Languages. University of Hawai’i Press.
Rosliani, Mulia, A., & Siagian, M. R. (2021). Cerita Rakyat Simalungun dalam Bahasa Simalungun, Bahasa Indonesia, dan Bahasa Inggris. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sumatra Utara.
Sartono. (2021). Menyongsong Dekade Internasional Bahasa Daerah 2022-2032. Masyarakat & Budaya, 23(21), 1--5. https://pmb.brin.go.id/menyongsong-dekade-internasional-bahasa-daerah-2022-2032/?amp
UNESCO. (2021a). Evaluation of UNESCO’s Action to Revitalize and Promote Indigenous Languages. Internal Oversight Service UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021b). Global Action Plan: The International Decade of Indigenous Languages. https://en.unesco.org/idil2022-2032
Wray, K. B. (2023). Kuhn’s Intellectual Path: Charting The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.