Challenges of EFL Course Retaking: Toward a Model for Remedial Reading

Main Article Content

Abduljalil Hazaea

Keywords

Classroom challenges, course specifications, English as a foreign language, reading, course retakers, remedial classes

Abstract

Course retaking brings pivotal challenges for learning institutions all over the world. This urges many academicians to investigate the reasons why students retake courses. Therefore, this article identifies the micro and macro challenges associated with retaking a reading course. It also generates a remedial reading model for English as foreign language (EFL) contexts. Data was collected from reading course specifications, course report, and focused group discussions with six experienced language instructors at the preparatory year program of a Saudi university. Using grounded theory, the qualitative data was analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings revealed a complex web of challenges associated with different stakeholders: the course retakers, language instructors, administration, and retakers’ families; all of them share the challenge of time constraints, especially after the shift from two to three semesters. At the micro level, course retakers struggle with poor foundational skills and demotivation, focusing on passing exams. They also lack exposure to English and seldom invest office hours for help. Language instructors struggle with learning materials, demotivation, and assessment. At the macro level, students’ families contribute to maximize these challenges. A gap exists between the intended learning outcomes and student levels and admission criteria. These challenges collectively hinder course retakers’ reading skills. The study generates a five-pillar bridging model that integrates learning outcomes, exam-oriented teaching strategies, simplified reading materials, technology-assisted reading, and motivational strategies to foster EFL remedial reading. The study recommends some pedagogical implications for remedial reading classes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abío, G., Alcañiz, M., Gómez-Puig, M., Rubert, G., Serrano, M., Stoyanova, A., & Vilalta-Bufí, M. (2019). Retaking a course in economics: Innovative teaching strategies to improve academic performance in groups of low-performing students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(2), 206-216. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1389289
Al Ghaithi, A., & Behforouz, B. (2023). EFL low-achieving learners and effectiveness of remedial instruction. Language Teaching Research, 34, 35-48. https://dx.doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.34.03
Alghamdi, F., & Siddiqui, O. (2016). Supporting low-achieving EFL learners: Expectations, procedure and significance of remedial sessions at a Saudi university. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(12), 204-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i12.2028
Almekhlafy, S. S. A., & Alqahtani, A. A. J. (2020). The visual memory development technique: A remedial and pre-reading activity to enhance EFL learners’ motivation. Heliyon, 6(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03627
Al Othman, F. H., & Shuqair, K. M. (2013). Effectiveness of the remedial courses on improving EFL/ESL students’ performance at university level in the Arab world. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(3), 132-138. https://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n3p132
Asghar, I., Irshad, S., & Abbas, A. (2023). English language teachers’ perceptions about outcomes-based approach for developing English language competencies. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(1), 666-678.
Bendak, L. (2018). Effects of applying repeated readings method on reading fluency and passage comprehension of slow learners. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine, 16(1), 232-237. https://dx.doi.org/10.5742/mewfm.2018.93226
Bhooth, A., Azman, H., & Ismail, K. (2014). The role of the L1 as a scaffolding tool in the EFL reading classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 76-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.011
Binu, P. (2021). Slow learners in the English Classroom. Notion Press.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00988593
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eno, M. A. (2019). Impact of remedial teaching on ESL/EFL low achievers: An Arabian gulf experience. International Journal of English Research, 5(2), 58-64.
Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2018). Impact of mobile assisted language learning on learner autonomy in EFL reading context. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 48-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-2-48-58
Hazaea, A. N., & Tayeb, Y. A. (2018). Washback effect of LOBELA on EFL teaching at the preparatory year of Najran University. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 5(3), 1-14.
Hazaea, A. N., & Almekhlafy, S. S. A. (2022). Timed reading activity for developing EFL students’ reading skills in mixed-ability classes. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 18(1), 49-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lthe-01-2021-0006
Hennink, M. M. (2013). Focus group discussions. Oxford University Press.
Hsu, Y.-K., & Chen, Y.-H. (2007). EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices regarding the implementation of remedial instruction for underachievers. Yīngyǔ jiàoxué qíkān, 31(2), 1-43.
Hu, T.-C., & Hsu, Y.-J. (2020). Effects of a remedial program on beginner-level, low-achieving EFL learners. Bull. Educ. Psychol, 51(4), 687-711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202006_51(4).0008
Huang, C.-P. (2010). Making English remedial instruction work for low-achieving students: an empirical study. Journal of Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, 29(6), 167-183.
Jenks, C. J. (2020). Applying critical discourse analysis to classrooms. Classroom Discourse, 11(2), 99-106, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1761847
Kim, S. Y. (2009). Questioning the stability of foreign language classroom anxiety and motivation across different classroom contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 42(1), 138-157.
Louis, R. S., & Pereira, S. (2003). Student involvement in an EST reading course for remedial students: A case study. Reading, 3(2), 22-46.
Luoch, T. O. (2014). The impact of remedial English on the improvement of English proficiency: The case of the United States international university-Africa. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1178-1188. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.296
Maawa, P. K. L., & Cruz, R. O.-D. (2019). Remedial and corrective feedback strategies for improving students’ English language proficiency. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 1-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.7794
Moskovsky, C. (2018). EFL teaching and learning in Saudi Arabia: 25 years of research. In C. Moskovsky & M. Picard (Eds.), English as a foreign language in Saudi Arabia new insights into teaching and learning English (pp. 4-69). Routledge https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315688466-2
Obeidat, M. M. (2020). A remedial English course from the freshmen EFL Learners’ viewpoints and expectations at the Hashemite University in Jordan. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 89-106. https://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p89
Qian, J. (2008). English classroom interaction between slow learners and teachers: A case study of slow learners at primary level in Suzhou district, China (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Oslo.
Romova, Z. & Andrew, M. (2011). Teaching and assessing academic writing via the portfolio: Benefits for learners of English as an additional language. Assessing Writing, 16(2), 111-122. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.005
Rosi, F., Zen, E. L., & Nurjannah, S. (2024). Teachers’ perception of differentiated instruction for slow learners in inclusive school Yogyakarta. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.668
Salmona Madriñan, M. (2014). The use of first language in the second-language classroom: A support for second language acquisition. Gist Education and learNing Research Journal, 9, 50-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203117835-22
Shanmugam, K., & Jeevarathinam, N. (2021). The problems of slow learners in English language classroom-a study. International Journal of ELT, Linguistics and Comparative Literature, 9(3), 8-11.
Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language teaching research, 9(1), 5-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr152oa
Takase, A. & Otsuki, K. (2012). New challenges to motivate remedial EFL students to read extensively. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(20, 75-94.
Turney, L., & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 32-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/160940690500400203
Urmston, A. (2003). Learning to teach English in Hong Kong: The opinions of teachers in training. Language and Education, 17(2), 112-137. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666843
Yulian, R., Ruhama, U., & Utami, P. Y. (2022). EFL slow learners’ perception in speaking with authentic multimedia assisted language learning. International Journal of Language Education, 6(2), 183-195.